T
TABARC-Code/Chaos-Skill Claude-Code-skill
Adds bounded, honest randomness to any learning project: study plans, courses, practice routines
在 GitHub 查看 ↗链接已于 2026-11-12 核查 · HTTP 200 · 打开的是厂商自己的官网
- ★ 数取值
- 0 ★ · TABARC-Code/Chaos-Skill---Claude-Code-skill · 取自 GitHub 搜索 API · (2026-11-13 20:00:50 核对)
- 来源明细
- 从该仓库的 GitHub 页面直接读取 · 条目类型:开源项目
- 收录与活跃
- 收录于 2026-11-10 · 最近见到 2026-11-14 · 共见到 5 次 · 被 1 个来源列出
- 评分构成
- 综合分 103 · 1 个来源 · repo
常见问题(答案都来自我们的记录)
它适合谁 / 用来做什么?
我们把它归在这些标签下: 开源项目。标签来自条目自身,不是我们强加的分类。
谁维护它、还在更新吗?
仓库
TABARC-Code/Chaos-Skill---Claude-Code-skill;我们收录于 2026-11-10;最近见到 2026-11-14。这里没有"官方认证"或"质量评级"——我们只记录来源与时间。# chaos-seed
以下摘录自该仓库的 README(片段) · 在 GitHub 读完整 README →
Bounded randomness for learning projects, plus a way to find out whether it helps you.
Author: TABARC-Code. Version 3.0.0. Python 3, standard library only.
## What it does
It shuffles practice order, jitters review gaps inside limits you set, suggests a difficulty level from an Elo-style rating, and hands out the occasional wildcard exercise. Draws can be sealed behind a SHA-256 hash and revealed later, so you can't peek and nudge. If you want evidence rather than vibes, it can also run a hidden control: some sessions get zero randomness, some get the real thing, and you compare.
## What it doesn't do
It doesn't make you learn faster. Spacing and interleaving have decent support. Random variation as such doesn't, as far as I could find. The experiment exists because of that gap, and with a normal amount of data it will mostly shrug and say "can't tell yet".
"Quantum" is only claimed when a live ANU quantum feed answered, passed basic health tests, and was XORed with OS randomness. I haven't been able to test that path with a real key. The unit tests mock it. Without a key you get the OS CSPRNG, which is excellent and not quantum.
## Install
Copy the folder anywhere and run scripts/chaos.py with Python 3. SKILL.md is there if you want to load it as an agent skill; the script doesn't need it. Nothing to pip install.
## First run
python3 scripts/chaos.py shuffle --items "scales,sight-reading,theory"
python3 scripts/chaos.py log --skill piano --level 4 --result 1 --p 0.8
python3 scripts/chaos.py next --skill piano
python3 scripts/chaos.py report --text
State goes in .chaos/ledger.json in the current directory. Use --dir to move it.
## The experiment
python3 scripts/chaos.py tune pick # arm stays hidden
# ...do the session, logging attempts...
python3 scripts/chaos.py tune clear
python3 scripts/chaos.py tune report # needs 4 sessions per arm
Assignment is in shuffled blocks of four, two control and two chaos. It doesn't adapt to results, because adaptive allocation biases the estimate. Rough error rates from simulation, assuming independent attempts: about 10% false alarms on pure noise, and a 0.10 real gain is spotted about half the time at 14 sessions per arm. Real sessions are messier, so expect worse. The report is descriptive. It doesn't model carryover or learning over time, and you can often guess which arm you're in.
## Commands
draw, reveal, plan, shuffle, drift, wildcard, log, next, report, tune, retro, entropy, feedback, status. Run with -h for flags.
Author: TABARC-Code. Version 3.0.0. Python 3, standard library only.
## What it does
It shuffles practice order, jitters review gaps inside limits you set, suggests a difficulty level from an Elo-style rating, and hands out the occasional wildcard exercise. Draws can be sealed behind a SHA-256 hash and revealed later, so you can't peek and nudge. If you want evidence rather than vibes, it can also run a hidden control: some sessions get zero randomness, some get the real thing, and you compare.
## What it doesn't do
It doesn't make you learn faster. Spacing and interleaving have decent support. Random variation as such doesn't, as far as I could find. The experiment exists because of that gap, and with a normal amount of data it will mostly shrug and say "can't tell yet".
"Quantum" is only claimed when a live ANU quantum feed answered, passed basic health tests, and was XORed with OS randomness. I haven't been able to test that path with a real key. The unit tests mock it. Without a key you get the OS CSPRNG, which is excellent and not quantum.
## Install
Copy the folder anywhere and run scripts/chaos.py with Python 3. SKILL.md is there if you want to load it as an agent skill; the script doesn't need it. Nothing to pip install.
## First run
python3 scripts/chaos.py shuffle --items "scales,sight-reading,theory"
python3 scripts/chaos.py log --skill piano --level 4 --result 1 --p 0.8
python3 scripts/chaos.py next --skill piano
python3 scripts/chaos.py report --text
State goes in .chaos/ledger.json in the current directory. Use --dir to move it.
## The experiment
python3 scripts/chaos.py tune pick # arm stays hidden
# ...do the session, logging attempts...
python3 scripts/chaos.py tune clear
python3 scripts/chaos.py tune report # needs 4 sessions per arm
Assignment is in shuffled blocks of four, two control and two chaos. It doesn't adapt to results, because adaptive allocation biases the estimate. Rough error rates from simulation, assuming independent attempts: about 10% false alarms on pure noise, and a 0.10 real gain is spotted about half the time at 14 sessions per arm. Real sessions are messier, so expect worse. The report is descriptive. It doesn't model carryover or learning over time, and you can often guess which arm you're in.
## Commands
draw, reveal, plan, shuffle, drift, wildcard, log, next, report, tune, retro, entropy, feedback, status. Run with -h for flags.
收录徽章(可选)
想把收录标记放进 README 就复制这行,可选,不影响收录。
[](https://anclum.com/zh/s/tabarc-code-chaos-skill-claude-code-skill/)
- 来源
- github · https://github.com/TABARC-Code/Chaos-Skill---Claude-Code-skill
- 按领域浏览
- 开源项目
- 收录于
- 今天
同类推荐
所属领域与标签
每个标签都能点进去看同类的全部条目。数字是当前库里的真实条数。