S
shrwnsan/tempo
tempo — safety-proportional process for agentic SDLC (Claude Code plugin, developed via the…
在 GitHub 查看 ↗链接已于 2026-11-12 核查 · HTTP 200 · 打开的是厂商自己的官网
- ★ 数取值
- 0 ★ · shrwnsan/tempo · 取自 GitHub 搜索 API · (2026-11-13 20:00:50 核对)
- 来源明细
- 从该仓库的 GitHub 页面直接读取 · 条目类型:开源项目
- 收录与活跃
- 收录于 2026-11-07 · 最近见到 2026-11-14 · 共见到 8 次 · 被 2 个来源列出
- 评分构成
- 综合分 203 · 2 个来源 · repo
常见问题(答案都来自我们的记录)
它适合谁 / 用来做什么?
我们把它归在这些标签下: 开源项目。标签来自条目自身,不是我们强加的分类。
谁维护它、还在更新吗?
仓库
shrwnsan/tempo;我们收录于 2026-11-07;最近见到 2026-11-14。这里没有"官方认证"或"质量评级"——我们只记录来源与时间。# tempo
以下摘录自该仓库的 README(片段) · 在 GitHub 读完整 README →
Safety-proportional process for agentic SDLC. Trivial changes skip ceremony;
risky changes earn it.
This is the namespace and landing repo for the tempo Claude Code plugin. The
plugin is developed and released through the
VibeKit plugin marketplace
— canonical source:
plugins/tempo.
## Results at a glance
On the fixed benchmark harness (medians of 3 runs per task, every task passed
hidden verification):
Risky changes: 34% fewer tokens than bare Claude Code, with the plan
file and review gate included
Trivial changes: fewer turns and faster wall-clock than bare
Standard changes: test-first plus full verification costs about 1.9×
bare — and on the same-CLI comparison comes in slightly under the
process-heavy reference plugin (0.79× its tokens, 0.91× its turns)
75 of 75 tasks passed hidden verification across every benchmark run
## Install
claude plugin install https://github.com/shrwnsan/vibekit-claude-plugins
## What it does
A ~10-line routing table injected once per session — not a philosophy lecture
Every task tiers 0 / 1 / 2 by risk; tier 0 usually loads nothing at all
Tier 1: one-line plan note, test-first, single agent
Tier 2: short plan file → build → review gate → verify gate
Fail-twice auto-promotion: the same fix failing twice moves the task up a
tier automatically
Verify before done at every tier: run the checks, quote the evidence
Portable skills: the four skills are Agent Skills compliant — they work
in Pi and Amp via shared skill directories (routing hook stays
Claude Code-only)
## Why
On a fixed golden-task harness, the reference process-heavy plugin
(superpowers) cost 1.2–2.7× tokens and 1.45–1.8× turns more than bare Claude
Code at identical correctness, on every tier (33/33 hidden tests in both
conditions). tempo keeps the safety disciplines where they pay and drops the
flat tax everywhere else.
Latest benchmark, same harness and backend, medians of 3 runs per task (bare
re-based on the same CLI; superpowers is the October baseline):
| Tier | bare | superpowers | tempo |
| 0 trivial | 16.5 turns · 16.2k tok · 37s | 24 turns · 26.4k tok · 69s | 16 turns · 24.8k tok · 30s |
| 1 standard | 17 turns · 16.6k tok · 81s | 29 turns · 51k tok · 199s | 25.5 turns · 31.6k tok · 106s |
| 2 risky | 24.5 turns · 44.1k tok · 196s | 40.5 turns · 60.9k tok · 308s | 25 turns · 29.1k tok · 189s |
Hidden tests passed in every run recorded (75/75 across baselines, smoke, and
reruns). Tier 2 beat bare outright: 0.66× tokens at parity turns and
risky changes earn it.
This is the namespace and landing repo for the tempo Claude Code plugin. The
plugin is developed and released through the
VibeKit plugin marketplace
— canonical source:
plugins/tempo.
## Results at a glance
On the fixed benchmark harness (medians of 3 runs per task, every task passed
hidden verification):
Risky changes: 34% fewer tokens than bare Claude Code, with the plan
file and review gate included
Trivial changes: fewer turns and faster wall-clock than bare
Standard changes: test-first plus full verification costs about 1.9×
bare — and on the same-CLI comparison comes in slightly under the
process-heavy reference plugin (0.79× its tokens, 0.91× its turns)
75 of 75 tasks passed hidden verification across every benchmark run
## Install
claude plugin install https://github.com/shrwnsan/vibekit-claude-plugins
## What it does
A ~10-line routing table injected once per session — not a philosophy lecture
Every task tiers 0 / 1 / 2 by risk; tier 0 usually loads nothing at all
Tier 1: one-line plan note, test-first, single agent
Tier 2: short plan file → build → review gate → verify gate
Fail-twice auto-promotion: the same fix failing twice moves the task up a
tier automatically
Verify before done at every tier: run the checks, quote the evidence
Portable skills: the four skills are Agent Skills compliant — they work
in Pi and Amp via shared skill directories (routing hook stays
Claude Code-only)
## Why
On a fixed golden-task harness, the reference process-heavy plugin
(superpowers) cost 1.2–2.7× tokens and 1.45–1.8× turns more than bare Claude
Code at identical correctness, on every tier (33/33 hidden tests in both
conditions). tempo keeps the safety disciplines where they pay and drops the
flat tax everywhere else.
Latest benchmark, same harness and backend, medians of 3 runs per task (bare
re-based on the same CLI; superpowers is the October baseline):
| Tier | bare | superpowers | tempo |
| 0 trivial | 16.5 turns · 16.2k tok · 37s | 24 turns · 26.4k tok · 69s | 16 turns · 24.8k tok · 30s |
| 1 standard | 17 turns · 16.6k tok · 81s | 29 turns · 51k tok · 199s | 25.5 turns · 31.6k tok · 106s |
| 2 risky | 24.5 turns · 44.1k tok · 196s | 40.5 turns · 60.9k tok · 308s | 25 turns · 29.1k tok · 189s |
Hidden tests passed in every run recorded (75/75 across baselines, smoke, and
reruns). Tier 2 beat bare outright: 0.66× tokens at parity turns and
收录徽章(可选)
想把收录标记放进 README 就复制这行,可选,不影响收录。
[](https://anclum.com/zh/s/shrwnsan-tempo/)
- 来源
- github · https://github.com/shrwnsan/tempo
- 按领域浏览
- 开源项目
- 收录来源
- 2 个独立来源
- 收录于
- 今天
同类推荐
所属领域与标签
每个标签都能点进去看同类的全部条目。数字是当前库里的真实条数。