技能潮 SkillTide 提交收录
官方说明7 个来源MCP 服务8 天前
rudimentall1/agentic-wallet-guardian-v3

rudimentall1/agentic-wallet-guardian-v3

在 GitHub 查看 ↗直链 · 无中转页
配置模板(请按你的客户端调整)
claude mcp add agentic-wallet-guardian-v3 -- npx -y agentic-wallet-guardian-v3
这是根据仓库名生成的可粘贴骨架,命令行参数与包名请以该项目 README 为准。
★ 数取值
1 ★ · rudimentall1/agentic-wallet-guardian-v3 · 取自 GitHub 搜索 API · (2026-10-16 20:00:20 核对)
来源明细
收录自 punkpeye/awesome-mcp-servers 榜单(我们从中收集的条目之一) · 条目类型:MCP 服务
收录与活跃
收录于 2026-10-09 · 最近见到 2026-10-16 · 共见到 32 次 · 被 7 个来源列出
评分构成
综合分 703 · 1 ★ · 7 个来源 · mcp
常见问题(答案都来自我们的记录)
怎么安装?
我们【没有】从该仓库取到安装命令(我们的 install 覆盖率只有约 4%)。请看它的 README 或 releases 页。
它适合谁 / 用来做什么?
我们把它归在这些标签下: MCP 服务。标签来自条目自身,不是我们强加的分类。
谁维护它、还在更新吗?
仓库 rudimentall1/agentic-wallet-guardian-v3;我们收录于 2026-10-09;最近见到 2026-10-16。这里没有"官方认证"或"质量评级"——我们只记录来源与时间。
第三方质量标记

Agentic Wallet Guardian

以下摘录自该仓库的 README(片段) · 在 GitHub 读完整 README →

Watch the demo
Select the preview to play the video in your browser.
📄 Read the white paper
**Let AI agents transact on-chain without giving them unrestricted control of the wallet.** Guardian evaluates each proposed action before signing or broadcast and returns an explainable ALLOW / WARN / BLOCK decision.
It runs on your own infrastructure, using your own policy rules and your
own reputation data - see Why self-hosted for why that
matters and how this differs from calling a hosted security API directly.
Guardian is chain- and use-case-agnostic - Arc/USDC below is one live
deployment, not the whole scope. See docs/hackathons.md
for which track this submission targets and why.
Arc Mainnet Demo
**Live demo:** http://77.239.125.37:8765/arc
**Demo video:** https://youtu.be/srH0ZLwtwqQ
Agentic Wallet Guardian is deployed on Arc mainnet and includes a live browser demo for USDC payments. The Guardian evaluates the requested operation before execution, applies its security policies, and only an approved operation is passed to the user's wallet for signing.
**Verified Arc mainnet transaction:**
0xd781e8b04b5ca89c3a34fcec50a6636049f7647d2b0e1b2bb64d5b1ee54daadf
The transaction was successfully executed on Arc mainnet using USDC through the Guardian demo.
---
**See it decide, live:** run the API locally (GUARDIAN_ENABLE_CORS_FOR_BROWSER_DEMO=true
uvicorn api.main:app --reload), then open examples/browser-demo.html
in a browser - no build step, no server for the page itself. Every
scenario button sends a real POST /decision to your running instance
and renders the actual response (risk score, every signal that fed into
it, every policy rule that fired) - nothing in the page is scripted or
faked. GUARDIAN_ENABLE_CORS_FOR_BROWSER_DEMO is off by default (see
guardian/config.py) since it's specifically for this local-demo case,
not something to leave on for a real deployment.
---
Why self-hosted
There are good hosted alternatives for agent-transaction security (GoPlus's
AgentGuard, Blockaid, Chainalysis/TRM for compliance). If you just want a
risk score and don't care who sees the query, calling one of those directly
is less work than running this. Guardian exists for the cases where that
tradeoff doesn't work for you:
- **Nothing about which wallets, contracts, or amounts your agents touch
leaves your infrastructure.** Threat-intel and contract allow/deny checks
are local JSON files you populate yourself (see
data/threat_lists/README.md), not a lookup call to a third party. A
hosted API inherently sees every address and amount you ask it about.
- **Your policy rules live in your code, not a vendor's dashboard.**
Spending caps, reputation gates, and which action types require
confirmation are plain Python in guardian/policy/, reviewable and
changeable without waiting on anyone else's product roadmap.
- **No per-call fees or rate limits imposed by someone else** - only the
ones you configure for your own users (GUARDIAN_RATE_LIMIT_PER_MINUTE).
- **No vendor lock-in.** Every external data source (RPC endpoint,
Blockscout instance, DexScreener) is swappable behind a small provider
interface - see Architecture.
The honest tradeoff going the other way: you also take on running it,
keeping your local threat lists current, and you don't get a hosted
vendor's chain coverage or dedicated threat-research team for free. This is
the right choice for teams that specifically need data sovereignty or deep
policy customization - not a strict upgrade over every hosted option.
---
Architecture
Every data source in steps 2-4 is a small provider interface with a mock
implementation (zero config, zero network calls) and a real one, selected
per-source by environment variable - see .env.example. Switching from
demo mode to a real deployment is a config change, not a code change.
Repository layout
guardian/* is intentionally dependency-free (standard library only,
except where a real provider needs httpx or web3), so the decision
core can be unit-tested, embedded in another service, or ported to a
different web framework without dragging FastAPI along. Only api/
touches pydantic/FastAPI.
---
Honesty about the current state
This is real, runnable, tested decision infrastructure with real (not
mock) data sources available for every signal source - but "available"
isn't the same as "flip a switch and trust it blindly." Specifics:
- **Wallet (RPC provider):** is_contract and tx_count (nonce-based) are
reliable with any JSON-RPC endpoint. Wallet *age* requires an
来源
awesome · https://github.com/rudimentall1/agentic-wallet-guardian-v3
按领域浏览
MCP 服务
Traction
1 ★
收录于
昨天

更多MCP 服务

查看MCP 服务全部 5,525 条 →

所属领域与标签

每个标签都能点进去看同类的全部条目。数字是当前库里的真实条数。

浏览全部领域 →

← 返回索引