技能潮 SkillTide 提交收录
官方说明7 个来源MCP 服务8 天前
nipun-arora/wordpress-mcp-agent-bridge

nipun-arora/wordpress-mcp-agent-bridge

Agent Bridge — WordPress MCP for Claude Code and any MCP agent Agent Bridge is the safety and SEO layer for AI-edited WordPress: it proves every write, snapshots everything it touches, and refuses the writes you didn't authorize.
在 GitHub 查看 ↗直链 · 无中转页
配置模板(请按你的客户端调整)
claude mcp add wordpress-mcp-agent-bridge -- npx -y wordpress-mcp-agent-bridge
这是根据仓库名生成的可粘贴骨架,命令行参数与包名请以该项目 README 为准。
★ 数取值
0 ★ · nipun-arora/wordpress-mcp-agent-bridge · 取自 GitHub 搜索 API · (2026-10-16 20:00:20 核对)
来源明细
收录自 punkpeye/awesome-mcp-servers 榜单(我们从中收集的条目之一) · 条目类型:MCP 服务
收录与活跃
收录于 2026-10-09 · 最近见到 2026-10-16 · 共见到 32 次 · 被 7 个来源列出
评分构成
综合分 703 · 7 个来源 · mcp
常见问题(答案都来自我们的记录)
怎么安装?
我们【没有】从该仓库取到安装命令(我们的 install 覆盖率只有约 4%)。请看它的 README 或 releases 页。
它适合谁 / 用来做什么?
我们把它归在这些标签下: MCP 服务。标签来自条目自身,不是我们强加的分类。
谁维护它、还在更新吗?
仓库 nipun-arora/wordpress-mcp-agent-bridge;我们收录于 2026-10-09;最近见到 2026-10-16。这里没有"官方认证"或"质量评级"——我们只记录来源与时间。
第三方质量标记

Agent Bridge — WordPress MCP for Claude Code and any MCP agent

以下摘录自该仓库的 README(片段) · 在 GitHub 读完整 README →

*Agent Bridge is the safety and SEO layer for AI-edited WordPress: it proves every write, snapshots everything it touches, and refuses the writes you didn't authorize. It pairs with EMCP, which does the Elementor editing.*
What it is
Agent Bridge is a WordPress MCP for Claude Code and every other MCP client, built for self-hosted WordPress (WordPress.org installs, not WordPress.com) where an AI agent manages a site's SEO, schema, and safety net alongside, or instead of, a human editor in wp-admin. Claude Code is the primary documented client, but nothing here is Claude-specific: Cursor, Windsurf, Codex CLI, Gemini CLI, or any MCP client connects through the same official WordPress MCP Adapter endpoint, and the REST surface needs nothing beyond an Application Password. It's designed to pair with EMCP, the Elementor MCP for Claude Code most agents already reach for on layout work. EMCP edits the page. Agent Bridge never writes _elementor_data at all; what it covers is the layer builder tools consistently skip: Rank Math SEO fields, JSON-LD schema, content snapshots, and a restore that proves it converged.
Every write Agent Bridge makes is read back from the database before it's reported saved. Every page and post gets a stable content hash, so an agent can tell in one request whether anything has changed since it last looked, and a write aimed at content that predates the plugin's own activation is refused unless the caller proves it just captured a fresh snapshot of that exact post. Two kill switches, set in wp-config.php, let an operator take the whole thing offline or lock it to read-only without touching the plugin itself.
Why this exists
Most WordPress MCP servers report a write successful the moment their API returns HTTP 200. Of the safety-focused ones surveyed for this project's own competitive research, none publish a write that reads its own result back from the database before saying so, and none document a hash-verified restore, a proof that a rollback actually converged to what it claims, rather than just a note that a snapshot exists somewhere. See How Agent Bridge compares below for the specific tools, what each documents, and the sources.
A live example of what a capability gap actually costs: in 2026, the AI Engine plugin's MCP module shipped a privilege-escalation flaw that let subscriber-level WordPress accounts hijack MCP-authenticated actions, on more than 100,000 sites (gbhackers.com/over-100000-wordpress-sites-exposed). The root cause was a capability check gap on MCP-authenticated calls: a request carrying a valid credential wasn't also checked against the specific WordPress capability the action required.
Agent Bridge closes that exact class of bug in its route design, not in a promise. Every route scoped to one post checks edit_post for that exact post ID (Agent_Bridge_Auth::can_edit_post()), never the blanket edit_posts grant a lower-privilege account might also hold. Routes that affect the whole site (restore, cache purge, health, the snapshot hash backfill) require manage_options. The Abilities API layer runs the identical checks per ability, not a looser mirror of them (Agent_Bridge_Abilities::permission_*).
Verified Writes
Every SEO field write and every schema write is followed immediately by a fresh get_post_meta() read from the database. A value is only reported saved once that read-back matches what was written, accounting for WordPress's own type coercion (array order, numeric-string image IDs). A caller never has to trust an HTTP 200: if the write-back doesn't match, the route returns a 500 with the field name, the value it tried to write, and what the database actually holds (Agent_Bridge_Seo::write(), Agent_Bridge_Schema::write()).
Stable Content Hash
Every page and post gets one SHA-256 hash, recomputed automatically whenever the post itself, its Elementor data, its bridge-scope SEO fields, or its Rank Math schema meta changes (hooked on save_post and the added_post_meta / updated_post_meta / deleted_post_meta actions in Agent_Bridge_Snapshot::init_hooks()). The hash covers post_content, the verbatim Elementor blob, and the sorted SEO plus schema meta, so one call to /snapshot/manifest tells a caller, for every page and post on the site, whether anything has touched it since the last time the caller looked.
Verified Restore
Restoring a snapshot doc is not "trust this backup." The request has to clear two separate proofs before anything is written. First, the document itself has to be self-consistent: the confirm token sent with the request has to equal the doc's own stated hash, and recomputing that hash from the doc's own content, Elementor data, SEO, and schema fields has to produce the same value (proof the doc is untampered, not just plausible-looking). Second, the caller has to prove it just read the post's real live state, via the same additive-only header the Additive-Only Gate below requires. Only once both gates pass does restore converge the post (content, Elementor data, SEO, and schema) to exactly what the doc says, deleting fields the doc doesn't mention rather than merely patching over them, and it hands back the resulting document so the convergence can be checked directly instead of assumed.
来源
awesome · https://github.com/nipun-arora/wordpress-mcp-agent-bridge
按领域浏览
MCP 服务
收录于
昨天

更多MCP 服务

查看MCP 服务全部 5,525 条 →

所属领域与标签

每个标签都能点进去看同类的全部条目。数字是当前库里的真实条数。

浏览全部领域 →

← 返回索引