技能潮 SkillTide 提交收录
官方说明7 个来源MCP 服务8 天前
motock/fagan

motock/fagan

Autonomous coding pipeline: a frontier model plans and reviews
在 GitHub 查看 ↗直链 · 无中转页
配置模板(请按你的客户端调整)
claude mcp add fagan -- npx -y fagan
这是根据仓库名生成的可粘贴骨架,命令行参数与包名请以该项目 README 为准。
★ 数取值
5 ★ · motock/fagan · 取自该仓库的 GitHub 页面 · (2026-10-16 20:00:20 核对)
来源明细
收录自 punkpeye/awesome-mcp-servers 榜单(我们从中收集的条目之一) · 条目类型:MCP 服务
收录与活跃
收录于 2026-10-09 · 最近见到 2026-10-16 · 共见到 32 次 · 被 7 个来源列出
评分构成
综合分 703 · 5 ★ · 7 个来源 · mcp
常见问题(答案都来自我们的记录)
怎么安装?
我们【没有】从该仓库取到安装命令(我们的 install 覆盖率只有约 4%)。请看它的 README 或 releases 页。
它适合谁 / 用来做什么?
我们把它归在这些标签下: MCP 服务。标签来自条目自身,不是我们强加的分类。
谁维护它、还在更新吗?
仓库 motock/fagan;我们收录于 2026-10-09;最近见到 2026-10-16。这里没有"官方认证"或"质量评级"——我们只记录来源与时间。
第三方质量标记

Fagan

以下摘录自该仓库的 README(片段) · 在 GitHub 读完整 README →

**Spend tokens on judgment, not typing.**
*A real story (STE-1, PR #986) crossing the board: implemented by an open-weight model, sent back once by review, merged. 14 minutes, time-lapsed.*
**Try it** (macOS; Linux via Ollama or LM Studio), then see the Quickstart:
Frontier models cost money per token and are excellent at judgment. Local models
run free and are adequate at typing. This pipeline splits software engineering
along exactly that line: a frontier model decomposes the work, plans it, reviews
the diff, and adjudicates anything risky — while a local model writes the
implementation at no marginal cost.
What makes the cheap half trustworthy is inspection. In Michael Fagan's 1976 IBM
study,
formal inspection found 82% of the defects in the released product — 38 per KLOC,
against 8 per KLOC for unit testing. Quality lives in the gate, not in the author.
So this project spends its budget on gates: TDD enforced before implementation, an
independent review pass, acceptance-oracle grading, a risk-tiered overlord that
stops for a human on anything irreversible, and a merge gate that re-runs the suite
against the rebased branch before anything lands.
The goal is narrow and specific: enterprise-grade engineering discipline —
decomposition, TDD, code review, dependency-ordered delivery — on a $20/month
budget.
For detailed reference material, see REFERENCE.md.
**Before you start:** read Reliability & limitations
below. This is an autonomous coding pipeline with real, documented failure
modes — it is not a hands-off "describe a feature, get a PR" tool yet.
Platform support
Developed and run day-to-day on **macOS**. The core (MCP server, dashboard,
Claude-backend dispatch/review, the full test suite) is plain Python and CI
tests it on Ubuntu across Python 3.12–3.14 on every push. Two pieces are
**macOS-only**:
- **launchd/*.plist** — the scheduler/MLX-supervisor/usage-poller are
packaged as launchd jobs on macOS. On Linux, render the systemd equivalent
with scripts/generate_systemd_units.sh (see Scheduler below)
instead of hand-rolling init files, or run the entry points directly in a
foreground terminal/tmux session.
- **MLX** (PIPELINE_LOCAL_PROVIDER=mlx) — Apple Silicon only. Local dispatch
works fine on Linux via **Ollama** or **LM Studio** instead
(PIPELINE_LOCAL_PROVIDER=ollama / lmstudio).
Windows is untested.
Quickstart
One-line install
This clones the repo to ~/.fagan (override the location with
FAGAN_INSTALL_DIR, and the source URL with FAGAN_REPO_URL) and runs
scripts/install.sh inside it -- equivalent to the manual clone-and-run
steps below, minus the typing. Re-running it later updates the existing
checkout (git pull --ff-only) instead of re-cloning.
Piping a remote script into bash means trusting whatever that URL serves
at fetch time. If you'd rather read it first:
Either way, cd into the install directory it reports (~/.fagan by
default); it has already done steps 1–3 below, so restart Claude Code (step 5). Prefer a manual clone? Use the
steps below instead.
This gets the MCP server registered and a first plan running end-to-end.
A first run needs no local model at all: with nothing configured, dispatch
and review fall back to the claude backend, which shells out to the Claude
Code CLI. That fallback is the *starting* configuration, not the intended one
— the cost split described above only happens once you deliberately route
the implementation role to a local model, which is why the shipped registry
ships no roles block of its own: see **Provider selection & authorization**
below for how to make that choice when you're ready.
scripts/install.sh creates the .venv, installs requirements.txt and
requirements-dashboard.txt (the dashboard's fastapi/uvicorn deps, installed
on every run; a --dev install uses requirements-dev.txt, which already
includes the dashboard deps), and reports on the tools the pipeline shells out
to — required: git, gh, and the claude CLI; optional: ollama and
docker — with graceful-degradation messaging, and is safe to re-run. It does **not** register the MCP server, set environment
variables, or install the persona subagents — steps 2–3 above cover those. With
nothing but the claude backend configured, ollama/docker being absent is
expected, not an error.
From a Claude Code session in the project you want the pipeline to work on:
1. Ask the product-analyst subagent to turn a goal into epics/stories, or
hand-write a plan per the schema.
2. mcp__pipeline__save_plan (or ingest_plan) with that plan and a
来源
awesome · https://github.com/motock/fagan
按领域浏览
MCP 服务
Traction
5 ★
收录于
昨天

更多MCP 服务

查看MCP 服务全部 5,525 条 →

所属领域与标签

每个标签都能点进去看同类的全部条目。数字是当前库里的真实条数。

浏览全部领域 →

← 返回索引