技能潮 SkillTide 提交收录
官方说明3 个来源MCP 服务3 天前
microsoft/agent-governance-toolkit

microsoft/agent-governance-toolkit

🐍 🏠 - Kernel-level governance MCP server for AI agents
在 GitHub 查看 ↗直链 · 无中转页
官方说明🐍 🏠 - Kernel-level governance MCP server for AI agents. Provides deterministic policy enforcement, compliance checking (SOC2, GDPR, HIPAA), audit logging (SQLite-based), and human-in-the-loop approval
来源明细
收录自 rohitg00/awesome-devops-mcp-servers 榜单(我们从中收集的条目之一) · 条目类型:MCP 服务
收录与活跃
收录于 2026-10-14 · 最近见到 2026-10-16 · 共见到 4 次 · 被 3 个来源列出
评分构成
综合分 303 · 3 个来源 · mcp
常见问题(答案都来自我们的记录)
怎么安装?
我们【没有】从该仓库取到安装命令(我们的 install 覆盖率只有约 4%)。请看它的 README 或 releases 页。
它适合谁 / 用来做什么?
我们把它归在这些标签下: MCP 服务。标签来自条目自身,不是我们强加的分类。
谁维护它、还在更新吗?
我们收录于 2026-10-14;最近见到 2026-10-16。这里没有"官方认证"或"质量评级"——我们只记录来源与时间。
第三方质量标记

🌍 English | Español | 日本語 | 简体中文 | 한국어 | 繁體中文

以下摘录自该仓库的 README(片段) · 在 GitHub 读完整 README →

Agent Governance Toolkit
Ship agents to production without losing sleep
🚀 Quick Start ·
📋 Specifications ·
📦 PyPI ·
📝 Changelog
-brightgreen)
> [!IMPORTANT]
> **Public Preview** -- production-quality public preview releases. May have breaking changes before GA.
Policy enforcement, identity, sandboxing, and SRE for autonomous AI agents. One pip install, any framework.
---
The Problem
Your AI agents call tools, browse the web, query databases, and delegate to other agents. Once deployed, they make decisions autonomously. You need answers to three questions:
**1. Is this action allowed?** An agent with access to send_email and query_database should not be able to drop_table. OAuth scopes and IAM roles control which services an agent can reach, not what it does once connected.
**2. Which agent did this?** In a multi-agent system, five agents might share a single API key. When something goes wrong, "an agent did it" is not an incident response.
**3. Can you prove what happened?** Auditors and regulators need tamper-evident records of every decision: what policy was active, what the agent requested, and why it was allowed or denied.
Prompt-level safety ("please follow the rules") is not a control surface. It is a polite request to a stochastic system. OWASP LLM01:2025 states this explicitly: *"it is unclear if there are fool-proof methods of prevention for prompt injection."* The published numbers back this up. Andriushchenko et al. (ICLR 2025) report **100% attack success rate** on GPT-4o, GPT-3.5, Claude 3, and Llama-3 using adaptive attacks with logprob access and suffix optimization, evaluated against the JailbreakBench benchmark (Chao et al., NeurIPS 2024). Microsoft's own AI Red Teaming Agent formalizes **Attack Success Rate (ASR)**, the rate of policy violations under adversarial input, as the canonical metric for this class of failure. *Lessons from Red Teaming 100 Generative AI Products* reinforces the point: *"mitigations do not eliminate risk entirely"* and red teaming must be a continuous process because model-layer defenses are probabilistic by construction.
AGT does not try to win that fight inside the prompt. Every tool call, message send, and delegation is intercepted in deterministic application code *before* the model's intent reaches the wire. Actions the AGT kernel denies are not "unlikely." They are **structurally impossible**. That is the difference between asking an agent to behave and making it incapable of misbehaving.
---
Quick Start
**Prerequisites:** Python 3.11+
Use the [full] extra for the quick-start imports below. The base
agent-governance-toolkit wheel installs the compliance CLI only; the governance
modules live in the consolidated core distribution. The agentmesh quick-start
import remains the current wrapper API. Importing agent_os emits a
DeprecationWarning because the old agent-os-kernel distribution is deprecated.
Use agent-governance-toolkit-core (or the [full] extra that includes it) as
the replacement distribution. Policy-engine host code uses the ACS SDK;
agt-policies provides the one-way v4-to-v5 migration command. The pre-ACS
agent_os.policies rule model is gone, and BREAKING_CHANGES.md lists its
replacements.
The policy engine is published upstream as
agent-control-spec.
agent-hooks defines its
interception contract. AGT retains the AgentControl host APIs and framework
adapters in policy-engine/, not a second decision engine.
This keeps policy evaluation in one place. AGT can adopt upstream fixes through
a dependency update while keeping its host APIs and framework integrations.
See the ACS package guide for
the distinction between upstream packages and AGT's compatibility SDKs.
For Claude Code, add AGT as a plugin marketplace and install the governance plugin:
Govern any tool function in two lines:
On every call, safe_tool evaluates the YAML policy, logs the decision to an
audit trail, and raises GovernanceDenied when the policy blocks the action.
Or use the full AgentControl API for programmatic control:
AgentControl example
Run the complete ACS email-tool example.
来源
awesome · https://github.com/microsoft/agent-governance-toolkit
按领域浏览
MCP 服务
收录于
昨天

更多MCP 服务

查看MCP 服务全部 5,525 条 →

所属领域与标签

每个标签都能点进去看同类的全部条目。数字是当前库里的真实条数。

浏览全部领域 →

← 返回索引