技能潮 SkillTide 提交收录
官方说明7 个来源MCP 服务8 天前
markmhendrickson/neotoma

markmhendrickson/neotoma

Deterministic state layer for agents
在 GitHub 查看 ↗直链 · 无中转页
配置模板(请按你的客户端调整)
claude mcp add neotoma -- npx -y neotoma
这是根据仓库名生成的可粘贴骨架,命令行参数与包名请以该项目 README 为准。
★ 数取值
34 ★ · markmhendrickson/neotoma · 取自该仓库的 GitHub 页面 · (2026-10-16 20:00:20 核对)
来源明细
收录自 punkpeye/awesome-mcp-servers 榜单(我们从中收集的条目之一) · 条目类型:MCP 服务
收录与活跃
收录于 2026-10-09 · 最近见到 2026-10-16 · 共见到 32 次 · 被 7 个来源列出
评分构成
综合分 703 · 34 ★ · 7 个来源 · mcp
常见问题(答案都来自我们的记录)
怎么安装?
我们【没有】从该仓库取到安装命令(我们的 install 覆盖率只有约 4%)。请看它的 README 或 releases 页。
它适合谁 / 用来做什么?
我们把它归在这些标签下: MCP 服务。标签来自条目自身,不是我们强加的分类。
谁维护它、还在更新吗?
仓库 markmhendrickson/neotoma;我们收录于 2026-10-09;最近见到 2026-10-16。这里没有"官方认证"或"质量评级"——我们只记录来源与时间。
第三方质量标记

Neotoma

以下摘录自该仓库的 README(片段) · 在 GitHub 读完整 README →

**Agents cannot own work they cannot verify.**
You cannot delegate real work to agents you cannot hold to account. Accountability has two halves: what was true, and who was authorized. **Neotoma is the system of record for AI agents** — it answers what was true. Your agents can produce a value; they cannot tell you its version, its source, or whether it is still current. Neotoma versions every fact, attributes it to a source, and replays it.
What ships today is the foundation: a deterministic, versioned state layer that ingests sources into immutable observations and computes reproducible entity snapshots with full provenance, exposed over an MCP server, a REST API, a CLI, and a bundled web Inspector. See Vision and execution status for exactly where the implementation stands against the vision.
It is built for developers building and operating AI agents who need a persistent, deterministic, auditable memory layer shared across tools. The same engine serves two further groups: individuals running a personal cross-assistant memory on a single-user install, and operators running a shared, multi-user instance with agent access control. Agents store structured records (contacts, tasks, transactions, decisions, events, and any other type) once and read them back across every tool and session, and the same observations always reduce to the same state.
**neotoma.io** · **Install** · **Documentation** (also served in-app at /docs)
Vision and execution status
As agent use expands, reality fragments across chat histories, agent memories, files, databases, tickets, and application state. The failure is not retrieval — it is that humans and agents can no longer answer: *which assertion is current? which source introduced it? was it observed, inferred, or decided? who had authority to correct it? which agents relied on the previous version? is there legitimate disagreement?* Neotoma's long-term role is **collective epistemic coherence**: not "better semantic memory," but deterministic, governed, multi-party state that humans and agents maintain together — attributed, correctable, disagreement-aware, portable, and independent of any one model or application.
| Vision phase | What it means | Status |
| --- | --- | --- |
| **P0 — Deterministic single-writer state** | Append-only observations, hash-derived IDs, deterministic reduction, field-level provenance, corrections-win, replayable history | ✅ **Shipped and stable** — the core guarantee, in daily use |
| **P1 — Multi-user state foundations** | Human and agent identities, attributed writes, tenant isolation, access controls, shared instances | 🟡 **Partially shipped**: hosted multi-user mode with user_id tenancy, per-agent identity (AAuth, optional hardware attestation), capability grants, guest tokens, peer federation. Not yet: organizations/workspaces, membership lifecycle, invitations, offboarding |
| **P2 — Authority over state** | Domain ownership, correction rights, supersession, policy ownership, temporary grants, disclosure logs | 🟡 **Mechanisms exist** (corrections always win, SUPERSEDES relationships, per-operation access controls); authority *semantics* — who may correct what, scoped by domain — are future work |
| **P3 — Multi-principal semantics** | Competing interpretations, disputed claims, official positions, consensus vs unresolved disagreement, field-level policies, historical validity | 🔜 Planned — interpretations are first-class today; dispute/official-position semantics are not |
| **P4 — Organizational intelligence substrate** | Non-developer governance UI, "why does the system believe this?" explanations, impact analysis, authority-graph views, enterprise administration | 🔭 Vision — the Inspector's provenance and audit views are the seed |
Ateles is the other half. Accountability has two halves: **Neotoma answers what was true** (truth, memory, provenance); **Ateles answers who was authorized** (initiative, delegation, approval) — against Neotoma state. Neither is sufficient alone. Memory without authority tells you what happened but not whether it was permitted; authority without memory tells you who may act but not against what state.
What Neotoma is
Neotoma is a state layer, not a chat memory or a vector cache. It records immutable observations from your sources, resolves them into entities, and computes a current snapshot for each entity by reducing its observations in a deterministic order. Nothing is overwritten. Corrections and reinterpretations add new observations; the prior history stays intact and replayable.
来源
awesome · https://github.com/markmhendrickson/neotoma
按领域浏览
MCP 服务
Traction
34 ★
收录于
昨天

更多MCP 服务

查看MCP 服务全部 5,525 条 →

所属领域与标签

每个标签都能点进去看同类的全部条目。数字是当前库里的真实条数。

浏览全部领域 →

← 返回索引