技能潮 SkillTide 提交收录
官方说明7 个来源MCP 服务8 天前
likidodefi/riskstate-mcp

likidodefi/riskstate-mcp

📇 ☁️ 🍎 🪟 🐧 - Deterministic risk governance for BTC and ETH trading agents: a five-level policy engine with…
在 GitHub 查看 ↗直链 · 无中转页
官方说明📇 ☁️ 🍎 🪟 🐧 - Deterministic risk governance for BTC and ETH trading agents: a five-level policy engine with position sizing, leverage limits and trade blocking.
配置模板(请按你的客户端调整)
claude mcp add riskstate-mcp -- npx -y riskstate-mcp
这是根据仓库名生成的可粘贴骨架,命令行参数与包名请以该项目 README 为准。
★ 数取值
1 ★ · likidodefi/riskstate-mcp · 取自该仓库的 GitHub 页面 · (2026-10-16 20:00:20 核对)
来源明细
收录自 punkpeye/awesome-mcp-servers 榜单(我们从中收集的条目之一) · 条目类型:MCP 服务
收录与活跃
收录于 2026-10-09 · 最近见到 2026-10-16 · 共见到 32 次 · 被 7 个来源列出
评分构成
综合分 703 · 1 ★ · 7 个来源 · mcp
常见问题(答案都来自我们的记录)
怎么安装?
我们【没有】从该仓库取到安装命令(我们的 install 覆盖率只有约 4%)。请看它的 README 或 releases 页。
它适合谁 / 用来做什么?
我们把它归在这些标签下: MCP 服务。标签来自条目自身,不是我们强加的分类。
谁维护它、还在更新吗?
仓库 likidodefi/riskstate-mcp;我们收录于 2026-10-09;最近见到 2026-10-16。这里没有"官方认证"或"质量评级"——我们只记录来源与时间。
第三方质量标记

RiskState MCP Server

以下摘录自该仓库的 README(片段) · 在 GitHub 读完整 README →

MCP server for RiskState — pre-trade risk permissions for BTC/USD and ETH/USD. Spot, perpetual futures (perps), and DeFi borrowing aware.
Your system asks: **"How much can I risk right now?"**
RiskState answers with: policy level, max exposure, leverage limits, blocked actions — computed from 30+ real-time signals.
Two ways to use RiskState over MCP
**1. Remote connector — no install, no API key.** RiskState runs a hosted MCP
server (Streamable HTTP) with a free public tier:
Add it as a custom connector in Claude or
ChatGPT, then just ask what the risk
state of BTC is. It exposes three read-only tools — get_risk_state,
get_market_structure, get_playbook_status — covering all three engines, and
is listed on the official MCP registry as ai.riskstate/mcp.
Responses are the free public summary: the same altitude as the public
visualizer. policy_hash, composite subscores, positioning and macro detail
need a key.
**2. This package — stdio, keyed, full response.** Use it when you want the
complete audited payload in a local agent, or to pin a version in your own
toolchain. It needs a RISKSTATE_API_KEY and returns everything your key is
entitled to. That is what the rest of this README covers.
Tools
Four read-only tools, one per question you might ask before a trade:
| Tool | Answers | Endpoint | Key |
|------|---------|----------|-----|
| get_risk_policy | *How much exposure is allowed?* | POST /v1/risk-state | yes |
| get_market_structure | *Are we near a structural inflection?* | POST /v1/market-structure | yes |
| get_playbook_status | *Is a setup actionable right now?* | GET /api/playbook-data | no |
| check_trade | *Would THIS position be allowed?* | POST /v2/portfolio-risk-state | yes |
get_risk_policy returns:
| Field | Description |
|-------|-------------|
| policy_level | 5 levels: BLOCK_SURVIVAL, BLOCK_DEFENSIVE, CAUTIOUS, GREEN_SELECTIVE, GREEN_EXPANSION |
| max_size_pct | Maximum position size as % of portfolio (0-100) |
| leverage_max | Maximum allowed leverage multiplier |
| allowed_actions | What the agent CAN do at this policy level |
| blocked_actions | What the agent CANNOT do |
| confidence_score | Signal agreement x data quality (0-1) |
check_trade evaluates a hypothetical book — send the position you are
considering **plus anything you already hold**, since the caps are
portfolio-aware. It returns per position whether it is allowed, the size cap in
percent and dollars, and reason_codes when it is not. Those are blocking;
advisories are informational and do not affect allowed. It places no orders.
get_playbook_status reports a setup as actionable only when its conditions
match, no engine vetoed it, **and** it is not in alert cooldown. Setups that
match but already alerted are counted separately, so an agent polling this tool
does not act on the same signal twice.
Why there are no write tools
There is no update_policy, no set_limit, no exception management — and there
will not be. The premise of RiskState is that the system being governed cannot
move its own limits. Every decision is hashed (policy_hash) so it can be
audited afterwards against the inputs that produced it; a tool that let the
caller rewrite the policy would make that hash meaningless and the audit trail
decorative.
So the lifecycle here deliberately lives on one side: the engine computes, the
来源
awesome · https://github.com/likidodefi/riskstate-mcp
按领域浏览
MCP 服务
Traction
1 ★
收录于
昨天

更多MCP 服务

查看MCP 服务全部 5,525 条 →

所属领域与标签

每个标签都能点进去看同类的全部条目。数字是当前库里的真实条数。

浏览全部领域 →

← 返回索引