技能潮 SkillTide 提交收录
官方说明7 个来源MCP 服务8 天前
kyle641320/true-memory-fragments

kyle641320/true-memory-fragments

Prevent AI coding agents from acting on stale code context with source-aware freshness checks and hard stale gates.
在 GitHub 查看 ↗直链 · 无中转页
配置模板(请按你的客户端调整)
claude mcp add true-memory-fragments -- npx -y true-memory-fragments
这是根据仓库名生成的可粘贴骨架,命令行参数与包名请以该项目 README 为准。
★ 数取值
2 ★ · kyle641320/true-memory-fragments · 取自 GitHub 搜索 API · (2026-10-16 20:00:20 核对)
来源明细
收录自 punkpeye/awesome-mcp-servers 榜单(我们从中收集的条目之一) · 条目类型:MCP 服务
收录与活跃
收录于 2026-10-09 · 最近见到 2026-10-16 · 共见到 32 次 · 被 7 个来源列出
评分构成
综合分 703 · 2 ★ · 7 个来源 · mcp
常见问题(答案都来自我们的记录)
怎么安装?
我们【没有】从该仓库取到安装命令(我们的 install 覆盖率只有约 4%)。请看它的 README 或 releases 页。
它适合谁 / 用来做什么?
我们把它归在这些标签下: MCP 服务。标签来自条目自身,不是我们强加的分类。
谁维护它、还在更新吗?
仓库 kyle641320/true-memory-fragments;我们收录于 2026-10-09;最近见到 2026-10-16。这里没有"官方认证"或"质量评级"——我们只记录来源与时间。
第三方质量标记

True Memory Fragments

以下摘录自该仓库的 README(片段) · 在 GitHub 读完整 README →

**Code changed, but your AI coding agent still remembers the old call chain? TMF is source-bound code memory that flags stale claims and points back to current source.**
**Try demo · MCP setup · Evidence**
*30-second paced replay of real deterministic demo output, with labeled source excerpts—not an agent end-to-end test. Reread is requested, not executed.*
- **Traceable code relationships:** bind call, read, write, inheritance, and API claims to source fingerprints.
- **Explicit stale results:** omit stale claims and stop covered graph expansion instead of silently reusing old context.
- **Targeted reread guidance:** return source anchors so an agent can check the changed code.
Developer preview: enforcement depends on the host, configuration, and intercepted actions—not automatic blocking of all writes. Fresh does not mean correct; general token savings and production readiness are not established.
Who it is for
- AI coding agents that work across sessions on changing repositories
- Developers who need source-aware memory instead of stale cached facts
- Tool authors who want conservative graph expansion with explicit stale/unknown handling
Validated so far
- Source-bound freshness and stale-claim detection
- Hard stale gates that stop unsafe graph expansion
- Deterministic Python and Java validation
- Scoped agent experiments demonstrating stale-context prevention
TMF’s core stale-context protection mechanism has been validated in the covered
scenarios. Evaluation across more languages, repositories, and long-running
production workflows is ongoing.
What TMF is — and is not
**TMF is for:**
- AI coding agents working across sessions on changing codebases
- Preventing stale call-chain and dependency assumptions
- Source-bound code memory and conservative code-graph navigation
- Agent integrations that need an explicit stale/unknown result
**TMF is not:**
- A general chat-memory product or vector database
- A replacement for reading source code
- A guarantee that every claim is correct because it is fresh
- A proven general productivity or token-saving solution
Fresh means the source binding still matches. **Correctness still comes from source and validation.**
The repository includes a Java qualification suite: **46/46 qualifiers and 731/731 checks**. The historical unreleased audit baseline was **478/478 tests**; it is not the current test total. See the version-pinned test verification for historical rc3 and master results, explicit skips, and the intermittent master failure recorded at that time. The rc6 release notes describe Java reflex and receiver-resolution fixes and distinguish source validation from publication evidence. These are source-analysis and regression-test results, not a claim of production readiness or a general Agent outcome. Middleware mechanics are validated, and stale-context safety has positive evidence in the GUAVA M10 pre-read experiment. Broader productivity, speed, token savings, and general bug-prevention claims remain unproven. See the authoritative evidence status before making broader claims.
Flow
That is the whole loop: TMF keeps claims bound to source, refuses to reuse stale context, and provides source anchors for rereading; guidance may include extra related or heuristic matches.
Demo
The GIF above replays output from scripts/demo_stale_gate.py at commit de0236a57939. It shows deterministic stale-claim omission and source fallback, not an agent obeying the reread signal or completing a task. The 30-second timing is presentation pacing, not a runtime benchmark.
From a source checkout (Python 3.10+ and Git required):
Already cloned? Run only the final command from the repository root. This demo imports the checkout's source; it is not a standalone PyPI wheel verification, and installing the package alone does not download the demo script.
来源
awesome · https://github.com/kyle641320/true-memory-fragments
按领域浏览
MCP 服务
Traction
2 ★
收录于
昨天

更多MCP 服务

查看MCP 服务全部 5,525 条 →

所属领域与标签

每个标签都能点进去看同类的全部条目。数字是当前库里的真实条数。

浏览全部领域 →

← 返回索引