engram-rs
以下摘录自该仓库的 README(片段) · 在 GitHub 读完整 README →
Memory engine for AI agents. Two axes: **time** (three-layer decay & promotion) and **space** (self-organizing topic tree). Important memories get promoted, noise fades, related knowledge clusters automatically.
Most agent memory is a flat store — dump everything in, keyword search to get it back. No forgetting, no organization, no lifecycle. engram-rs adds the part that makes memory actually useful: the ability to forget what doesn't matter and surface what does.
Single Rust binary, one SQLite file, zero external dependencies. No Python, no Redis, no vector DB — curl | bash and it runs. ~10 MB binary, ~100 MB RSS, single-digit ms search latency.
Quick Start
What It Does
Three-Layer Lifecycle
Inspired by the Atkinson–Shiffrin memory model, memories are managed across three layers by importance:
- **Buffer**: Entry point for all new memories. Temporary staging — evicted when below threshold
- **Working**: Promoted via consolidation. Never deleted, importance decays at different rates by kind
- **Core**: Promoted through LLM quality gate. Never deleted
LLM Quality Gate
Promotion isn't rule-based guesswork — an LLM evaluates each memory in context and decides whether it genuinely warrants long-term retention.
Automatic Decay
Decay is activity-driven — it only fires during active consolidation cycles, not wall-clock time. If the system is idle, memories stay intact.
**Exponential decay** follows the Ebbinghaus forgetting curve — fast at first, then long-tail. Memories never fully vanish (floor = 0.01), remaining retrievable under precise queries. When a memory is recalled, it gets an **activation boost**, strengthening frequently-used knowledge.
| Kind | Decay rate | Half-life | Use case |
|------|-----------|-----------|----------|
| episodic | Fastest | ~35 epochs | Events, experiences, time-bound context |
| semantic | Medium | ~58 epochs | Knowledge, preferences, lessons (default) |
| procedural | Slowest | ~173 epochs | Workflows, instructions, how-to |
Algorithm Visualizations
| Chart | What it shows |
|-------|---------------|
| | **Sigmoid score compression.** Raw scores are mapped through a sigmoid function, approaching 1.0 asymptotically. High-relevance results remain distinguishable instead of being crushed into the same value. |
| | **Ebbinghaus forgetting curve.** Exponential decay with kind-differentiated rates — episodic memories fade fastest, procedural slowest. Floor at 0.01 means memories never fully vanish; they remain retrievable under precise queries. |
| | **Kind × layer weight bias.** Additive biases adjust memory weight by type and layer. Procedural+core memories rank highest, episodic+buffer lowest — but the spread stays bounded so no single combination dominates. |
| | **Reinforcement signals.** Repetition and access bonuses follow logarithmic saturation. Early interactions matter most; later ones contribute diminishing returns, discriminating between "used occasionally" and "used daily". |
| | **Use it or lose it.** Left: a memory that's never recalled decays into the buffer layer. Right: periodic recall triggers activation boosts that keep the memory in the working layer. Dashed line shows the unrecalled trajectory for comparison. |