J
jthorare/agentic-workflow
Portable Claude Code workflow toolkit: skills, config, repo bootstrapper, and MCP bridge for multi-agent…
在 GitHub 查看 ↗链接已于 2026-11-12 核查 · HTTP 200 · 打开的是厂商自己的官网
- ★ 数取值
- 3 ★ · jthorare/agentic-workflow · 取自 GitHub 搜索 API · (2026-11-13 20:00:50 核对)
- 来源明细
- 从该仓库的 GitHub 页面直接读取 · 条目类型:开源项目
- 收录与活跃
- 收录于 2026-10-26 · 最近见到 2026-11-14 · 共见到 23 次 · 被 2 个来源列出
- 评分构成
- 综合分 203 · 3 ★ · 2 个来源 · repo
常见问题(答案都来自我们的记录)
它适合谁 / 用来做什么?
我们把它归在这些标签下: 开源项目。标签来自条目自身,不是我们强加的分类。
谁维护它、还在更新吗?
仓库
jthorare/agentic-workflow;我们收录于 2026-10-26;最近见到 2026-11-14。这里没有"官方认证"或"质量评级"——我们只记录来源与时间。# Agentic Workflow
以下摘录自该仓库的 README(片段) · 在 GitHub 读完整 README →
A portable, provider-agnostic workflow toolkit for AI coding agents. It works the same way in Claude Code, Codex, and Cursor: 53 native skills plus 3 fetched external design packs (impeccable, emil-design-eng, taste-skill), a repo bootstrapper, safety hooks, a cheap-decision judge, Sindri (the C# control plane and workflow engine), and a token-efficiency tool (the rtk command rewriter).
There is one canonical core: skills, hook logic, MCP servers, and judge. Each provider gets a thin adapter on top. Skills describe capabilities ("ask the user", "spawn a subagent", "call an MCP tool"), and each provider maps those to its own tools. See Providers and planning/PROVIDERS.md.
> New here? Start with the onboarding guide: ONBOARDING.md, or the visual walkthrough in docs/onboarding.html (open it in a browser).
> Invoking skills: the examples below use / (Claude Code, Cursor). In Codex, use $ . For example, $review instead of /review.
## Workflow: Product Vision → Ship
This toolkit supports an end-to-end product workflow where AI sessions replace documents. The goal is to make GitHub issues the single source of truth, instead of piling up local markdown files.
### Stage 1 — Ideation
/withInterview
Human in the loop: You're in the hot seat. The agent interviews you. It asks questions, challenges assumptions, and surfaces contradictions while you answer in your own words. The output is a coherent problem statement and set of goals distilled from your raw thinking. You don't have to write polished prose yourself.
### Stage 2 — Spec & Design Doc
/officeHours [feature or problem]
Human in the loop: This is a back-and-forth collaboration. The agent proposes requirements and you push back. It drafts the technical design, and you redirect priorities and flag constraints it doesn't know about. Think of it as a YC office hours session: you leave with decisions made, not just options listed. It also gives structure to multi-team collaboration. Product and engineering can align on vision, scope, and trade-offs in a shared session before anyone writes a line of code. The output lands in ~/.agentic-workflow/ /plans/ /: a canonical plan.md handoff plus per-owner docs:
| File | Owner | Contents |
| product.md | Product | Problem statement, EARS requirements, acceptance criteria, success metrics, MVP scope |
| engineering.md | Engineering | Current state, approach, architecture decisions, open questions |
| design-brief.md | Design | Experience goals, key interactions, UX requirements, design language reference |
| TASKS.md | Engineering | Atomic task breakdown with domain tags for cross-team visibility |
Each file is a standalone artifact. Everyone leaves the session with a doc they own, not a monolith that nobody owns.
You can optionally pressure-test the outputs before moving on. Run each lens on its own, or use /autoplan to run them all in parallel:
/productReview # Founder/product lens: is this the right thing to build?
/archReview # Engineering lens: is this the right way to build it?
/autoplan # productReview + archReview + planDesignReview + planDevexReview + cso(plan), in parallel
### Stage 3 — Design System & Mockups
There is one canonical core: skills, hook logic, MCP servers, and judge. Each provider gets a thin adapter on top. Skills describe capabilities ("ask the user", "spawn a subagent", "call an MCP tool"), and each provider maps those to its own tools. See Providers and planning/PROVIDERS.md.
> New here? Start with the onboarding guide: ONBOARDING.md, or the visual walkthrough in docs/onboarding.html (open it in a browser).
> Invoking skills: the examples below use / (Claude Code, Cursor). In Codex, use $ . For example, $review instead of /review.
## Workflow: Product Vision → Ship
This toolkit supports an end-to-end product workflow where AI sessions replace documents. The goal is to make GitHub issues the single source of truth, instead of piling up local markdown files.
### Stage 1 — Ideation
/withInterview
Human in the loop: You're in the hot seat. The agent interviews you. It asks questions, challenges assumptions, and surfaces contradictions while you answer in your own words. The output is a coherent problem statement and set of goals distilled from your raw thinking. You don't have to write polished prose yourself.
### Stage 2 — Spec & Design Doc
/officeHours [feature or problem]
Human in the loop: This is a back-and-forth collaboration. The agent proposes requirements and you push back. It drafts the technical design, and you redirect priorities and flag constraints it doesn't know about. Think of it as a YC office hours session: you leave with decisions made, not just options listed. It also gives structure to multi-team collaboration. Product and engineering can align on vision, scope, and trade-offs in a shared session before anyone writes a line of code. The output lands in ~/.agentic-workflow/ /plans/ /: a canonical plan.md handoff plus per-owner docs:
| File | Owner | Contents |
| product.md | Product | Problem statement, EARS requirements, acceptance criteria, success metrics, MVP scope |
| engineering.md | Engineering | Current state, approach, architecture decisions, open questions |
| design-brief.md | Design | Experience goals, key interactions, UX requirements, design language reference |
| TASKS.md | Engineering | Atomic task breakdown with domain tags for cross-team visibility |
Each file is a standalone artifact. Everyone leaves the session with a doc they own, not a monolith that nobody owns.
You can optionally pressure-test the outputs before moving on. Run each lens on its own, or use /autoplan to run them all in parallel:
/productReview # Founder/product lens: is this the right thing to build?
/archReview # Engineering lens: is this the right way to build it?
/autoplan # productReview + archReview + planDesignReview + planDevexReview + cso(plan), in parallel
### Stage 3 — Design System & Mockups
收录徽章(可选)
想把收录标记放进 README 就复制这行,可选,不影响收录。
[](https://anclum.com/zh/s/jthorare-agentic-workflow/)
- 来源
- github · https://github.com/jthorare/agentic-workflow
- 按领域浏览
- 开源项目
- Traction
- 3 ★
- 收录来源
- 2 个独立来源
- 收录于
- 今天
同类推荐
所属领域与标签
每个标签都能点进去看同类的全部条目。数字是当前库里的真实条数。