J
JosiahAllard/Agentic-Software-Factory
Run a whole team of Claude Code agents on one machine, across every repository, without them trampling each…
在 GitHub 查看 ↗链接已于 2026-11-12 核查 · HTTP 200 · 打开的是厂商自己的官网
- ★ 数取值
- 0 ★ · JosiahAllard/Agentic-Software-Factory · 取自 GitHub 搜索 API · (2026-11-13 20:00:50 核对)
- 来源明细
- 从该仓库的 GitHub 页面直接读取 · 条目类型:开源项目
- 收录与活跃
- 收录于 2026-11-03 · 最近见到 2026-11-14 · 共见到 12 次 · 被 1 个来源列出
- 评分构成
- 综合分 103 · 1 个来源 · repo
常见问题(答案都来自我们的记录)
它适合谁 / 用来做什么?
我们把它归在这些标签下: 开源项目。标签来自条目自身,不是我们强加的分类。
谁维护它、还在更新吗?
仓库
JosiahAllard/Agentic-Software-Factory;我们收录于 2026-11-03;最近见到 2026-11-14。这里没有"官方认证"或"质量评级"——我们只记录来源与时间。# Agentic Software Factory
以下摘录自该仓库的 README(片段) · 在 GitHub 读完整 README →
Run a whole team of Claude Code agents on one Windows machine, across every repository you own,
without them trampling each other's work or the machine itself.
## What works today
Live since 2026-10-15, with landings in three repositories, and covered by tests:
A managed engineering organisation. One PM agent across repositories, one coordinator per
repository, worker agents in parallel, each in its own worktree. Roles are written once and
rendered for Claude Code and Codex (content/roles/, tools/rendercontent.py). Task list:
the backlog store (tools/backlog.py); questions and to-dos for the owner: the Action Hub
(tools/hub.py); sessions: the launcher (tools/launch.py).
Quality lives in the pipeline. A branch needs a passing gate record and an independent
reviewer's verdict. The landing then merges it onto current main in a separate tree and gates
the merged result; only a green merge is pushed. On red, the merge is dropped and main is
untouched. A daily full run covers the rest (tools/land.py, tools/gate.py, docs/gate.md
"Landing", tools/dailyfull.py).
Guardrails stop risky actions and say what to do instead. The hook guard refuses a
destructive git command in a main checkout, a search from a drive root or a heavy run outside
the lock, and each refusal names the right form on an Instead: line
(kitlib/guard/rules.py, docs/guard.md). A pre-push hook refuses a non-fast-forward push to
main (githooks/).
Shared machine resources are scheduled. Heavy runs queue for CPU and GPU slots in the
machine lock, and landings queue behind each other in it (tools/machinelock.py,
docs/lock-api.md, docs/gate.md "The landing queue").
Also in use: worktree cleanup (tools/worktreeremove.py).
Not done: Linux support is in progress (the kit still refuses Linux; docs/linux-support-plan.md),
and the Codex bridge is not live yet. Codex is a supported host for the roles, hooks and commit
tools; the bridge between agents is the part that is not.
## The problem
One Claude Code session is easy to supervise. Ten are not. Two agents edit the same checkout,
three full test suites start at once and starve the machine, a destructive git command fires in
the wrong folder, a red branch slips onto main, and the questions only you can answer scatter
across a dozen terminal windows.
## How the kit solves it
One project manager (PM) Claude session runs the machine. One coordinator session runs
each repository: it splits the work into tasks and hands each to an agent, so many agents build,
test and land code at the same time. The kit lays the rails they run on:
Machine lock. Heavy runs (full test suites, builds, renders, training) queue for CPU and
GPU slots instead of fighting over them, so the machine never overloads. You see the queue at
a glance and can hold the machine for yourself.
Guard. A hook in each host stops risky commands before they run: a destructive git command
in a main checkout, a search from a drive root, a heavy program run outside the lock. Every
refusal names the command to use instead.
Safe landing. One tool carries a branch to main. It merges the branch, tests the merged
result, pushes, and checks the push arrived. A failed test undoes the merge. Behind it, a git
without them trampling each other's work or the machine itself.
## What works today
Live since 2026-10-15, with landings in three repositories, and covered by tests:
A managed engineering organisation. One PM agent across repositories, one coordinator per
repository, worker agents in parallel, each in its own worktree. Roles are written once and
rendered for Claude Code and Codex (content/roles/, tools/rendercontent.py). Task list:
the backlog store (tools/backlog.py); questions and to-dos for the owner: the Action Hub
(tools/hub.py); sessions: the launcher (tools/launch.py).
Quality lives in the pipeline. A branch needs a passing gate record and an independent
reviewer's verdict. The landing then merges it onto current main in a separate tree and gates
the merged result; only a green merge is pushed. On red, the merge is dropped and main is
untouched. A daily full run covers the rest (tools/land.py, tools/gate.py, docs/gate.md
"Landing", tools/dailyfull.py).
Guardrails stop risky actions and say what to do instead. The hook guard refuses a
destructive git command in a main checkout, a search from a drive root or a heavy run outside
the lock, and each refusal names the right form on an Instead: line
(kitlib/guard/rules.py, docs/guard.md). A pre-push hook refuses a non-fast-forward push to
main (githooks/).
Shared machine resources are scheduled. Heavy runs queue for CPU and GPU slots in the
machine lock, and landings queue behind each other in it (tools/machinelock.py,
docs/lock-api.md, docs/gate.md "The landing queue").
Also in use: worktree cleanup (tools/worktreeremove.py).
Not done: Linux support is in progress (the kit still refuses Linux; docs/linux-support-plan.md),
and the Codex bridge is not live yet. Codex is a supported host for the roles, hooks and commit
tools; the bridge between agents is the part that is not.
## The problem
One Claude Code session is easy to supervise. Ten are not. Two agents edit the same checkout,
three full test suites start at once and starve the machine, a destructive git command fires in
the wrong folder, a red branch slips onto main, and the questions only you can answer scatter
across a dozen terminal windows.
## How the kit solves it
One project manager (PM) Claude session runs the machine. One coordinator session runs
each repository: it splits the work into tasks and hands each to an agent, so many agents build,
test and land code at the same time. The kit lays the rails they run on:
Machine lock. Heavy runs (full test suites, builds, renders, training) queue for CPU and
GPU slots instead of fighting over them, so the machine never overloads. You see the queue at
a glance and can hold the machine for yourself.
Guard. A hook in each host stops risky commands before they run: a destructive git command
in a main checkout, a search from a drive root, a heavy program run outside the lock. Every
refusal names the command to use instead.
Safe landing. One tool carries a branch to main. It merges the branch, tests the merged
result, pushes, and checks the push arrived. A failed test undoes the merge. Behind it, a git
收录徽章(可选)
想把收录标记放进 README 就复制这行,可选,不影响收录。
[](https://anclum.com/zh/s/josiahallard-agentic-software-factory/)
- 来源
- github · https://github.com/JosiahAllard/Agentic-Software-Factory
- 按领域浏览
- 开源项目
- 收录于
- 今天
同类推荐
所属领域与标签
每个标签都能点进去看同类的全部条目。数字是当前库里的真实条数。