技能潮 SkillTide 提交收录
官方说明7 个来源MCP 服务8 天前
Jiangw2718i/frisk

Jiangw2718i/frisk

Screen x402 payment counterparties before pa
在 GitHub 查看 ↗直链 · 无中转页
配置模板(请按你的客户端调整)
claude mcp add frisk -- npx -y frisk
这是根据仓库名生成的可粘贴骨架,命令行参数与包名请以该项目 README 为准。
★ 数取值
1 ★ · Jiangw2718i/frisk · 取自 GitHub 搜索 API · (2026-10-16 20:00:20 核对)
来源明细
收录自 punkpeye/awesome-mcp-servers 榜单(我们从中收集的条目之一) · 条目类型:MCP 服务
收录与活跃
收录于 2026-10-09 · 最近见到 2026-10-16 · 共见到 32 次 · 被 7 个来源列出
评分构成
综合分 703 · 1 ★ · 7 个来源 · mcp
常见问题(答案都来自我们的记录)
怎么安装?
我们【没有】从该仓库取到安装命令(我们的 install 覆盖率只有约 4%)。请看它的 README 或 releases 页。
它适合谁 / 用来做什么?
我们把它归在这些标签下: MCP 服务。标签来自条目自身,不是我们强加的分类。
谁维护它、还在更新吗?
仓库 Jiangw2718i/frisk;我们收录于 2026-10-09;最近见到 2026-10-16。这里没有"官方认证"或"质量评级"——我们只记录来源与时间。
第三方质量标记

Frisk

以下摘录自该仓库的 README(片段) · 在 GitHub 读完整 README →

**Pre-transaction risk screening for autonomous AI agents.**
Before your agent pays an x402 seller or calls an unfamiliar tool, ask Frisk
whether the counterparty is trustworthy and whether the transaction fits your
policy. Frisk returns a verdict — allow, review, or block — with a trust
score and human-readable reasons. It is advisory: your agent stays in control
of the decision.
Surfaces
| Surface | Package | Source |
| -------------- | ---------------------- | ---------------------------- |
| TypeScript SDK | frisk-screen (npm) | typescript/ |
| Python SDK | frisk-screen (PyPI) | python/ |
| MCP server | frisk-mcp (npm) | mcp/ |
Both SDKs expose the same model: a Client with a screen() call, a lite
mode that runs locally with zero dependencies, and an optional hosted mode for
reputation history and live threat intelligence.
MCP server
For agents that cannot import a library, and for asking the question
interactively, the same checks are available as an MCP server exposing one
tool, screen_payment:
No API key and no account: with no configuration it screens entirely on your
machine. It is listed in the MCP registry as dev.tryfrisk/frisk.
An MCP tool runs only when a model chooses to call it, so a check the model can
skip is a weaker guarantee than the same check on the code path that signs the
payment. Where the money actually moves, prefer the SDK. Details in
mcp/.
Lite mode vs. hosted
| | Lite (default) | Hosted (API key) |
| ---------- | ------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------- |
| Runs | Locally, offline | Frisk API |
| Signals | Public, structural checks only | Reputation graph, trained models, threat feed |
| Confidence | Always low | Rises with coverage |
| Cost | Free | Usage-based |
Lite mode catches obvious problems — malformed counterparties, payTo swaps,
insecure endpoints, policy violations, and a small seed blocklist — without a
network call. The hosted API (https://api.tryfrisk.dev) adds reputation
history and continuously updated threat intelligence.
What a verdict covers
Frisk screens who you are paying. An allow means nothing disqualifying was
found by the checks you gave it enough information to run: the counterparty
parses as an address and is not on the blocklist, the payTo the endpoint
asked for matches the counterparty you named, the endpoint is served over
HTTPS, and the amount and asset fall inside the policy you supplied. A check
whose input you leave out does not run and does not fail — omit
observedPayTo and no payTo comparison happens. In hosted mode an allow
also means no adverse reputation history was found.
It says nothing about what comes back. Whether the response matches the shape
you expected, contains the data you paid for, or is worth the price is a
separate question, and Frisk deliberately does not answer it. Verifying the
来源
awesome · https://github.com/Jiangw2718i/frisk
按领域浏览
MCP 服务
Traction
1 ★
收录于
昨天

更多MCP 服务

查看MCP 服务全部 5,525 条 →

所属领域与标签

每个标签都能点进去看同类的全部条目。数字是当前库里的真实条数。

浏览全部领域 →

← 返回索引