独立运营 · 不出售排名位置  · 我们怎么评估工具 →
Anclum 提交收录
H

harriswekselblatt/pocp

Proof that the right tests ran on the exact code being merged, under rules the change can't loosen

装之前:没有可直接复制的命令 · 许可证 MIT · 链接可访问

第一步:这条暂时没有可执行的下一步,可先看原仓库 https://github.com/harriswekselblatt/pocp

在 GitHub 查看 ↗链接已于 2026-11-12 核查 · HTTP 200 · 打开的是厂商自己的官网
安装与配置
客户端配置(取自该仓库的安装命令)
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "harriswekselblatt-pocp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": ["pocp"]
    }
  }
}

解析自我们于 2026-11-05 抓取的该仓库 README;我们未执行过。

command/args 来自仓库写明的安装命令;不确定时请以该项目 README 为准。
VS Code(.vscode/mcp.json —— 键名是 servers)
{
  "servers": {
    "harriswekselblatt-pocp": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": ["pocp"]
    }
  }
}
VS Code 顶层键是 <code>servers</code>,其余与上面那份相同。
Claude Code(命令行)
claude mcp add --transport stdio harriswekselblatt-pocp -- npx pocp
Claude Code 不收 JSON 文件,用这条命令直接加。
配置项的键名以你的客户端为准:客户端与 CLI
★ 数取值
1 ★ · harriswekselblatt/pocp · 取自 GitHub 搜索 API · (2026-11-13 20:00:50 核对)
来源明细
从该仓库的 GitHub 页面直接读取 · 条目类型:开源项目
收录与活跃
收录于 2026-11-06 · 最近见到 2026-11-14 · 共见到 9 次 · 被 2 个来源列出
评分构成
综合分 203 · 1 ★ · 2 个来源 · repo
安装
npx pocp
常见问题(答案都来自我们的记录)
怎么安装?
该仓库给出的安装命令是 npx pocp。我们的记录里它是仓库自己提供的;不保证在你的客户端上直接可用。
它适合谁 / 用来做什么?
我们把它归在这些标签下: 开源项目。标签来自条目自身,不是我们强加的分类。
谁维护它、还在更新吗?
仓库 harriswekselblatt/pocp;我们收录于 2026-11-06;最近见到 2026-11-14。这里没有"官方认证"或"质量评级"——我们只记录来源与时间。

# POCP: Proof of Change Protocol

以下摘录自该仓库的 README(片段) · 在 GitHub 读完整 README →

POCP checks that the tests a pull request was supposed to pass actually ran, on the exact code being merged, under rules the pull request can't change. When a pull request edits existing tests, it runs the old tests on the new code, and holds risky test edits for human review. An optional deep mode also compares the old and new tests against a sample of planted bugs. It works with any test command and any language, and needs only Node 20 or later and git.
It doesn't prove your code is correct. It's also early: the results below come from a scripted test suite and small pilots, not a completed evaluation. To install it, see How to try it.
## Demo
An agent edits a failing test until CI turns green. POCP runs the old test against the new code and routes the suspicious change to human review.
To run it from a clone: node examples/demo/demo.mjs. It takes a few seconds and shortens POCP's output; --keep leaves the scratch repository so you can see everything.
## Why this exists
I started building with AI coding agents without knowing much about software, and I still can't read the code they write, not at the scale they write it. That left one question I couldn't let go of: if I can't read it, how do I trust it? How do I know a change does what I meant, doesn't quietly break something, and doesn't fake its way past the tests?
POCP is my answer. Instead of trusting a sentence an agent typed ("tests pass"), it records proof: the checks that ran, on the exact code that was committed, under rules the change itself can't loosen. Then it checks that proof again in CI.
I'm testing POCP with separate benchmarks and a reference checker that shares no implementation code with POCP. So far, only pilots have run. No counted evaluation exists, and the pre-registration is unfinished. The results and their limits are linked below.
## What it does
A rule in .proof/rules.json says which files need which checks:
json
"pocp": 1,
"requirements": [
{ "id": "billing-tests", "globs": ["src/billing/"],
"obligation": { "kind": "test", "run": "node --test test/billing.test.js" } }
A check is any command, such as npm test, pytest, cargo test, go test ./... or make check.
Locally, a git hook blocks a commit that touches src/billing/ until a packet records that node --test test/billing.test.js passed on exactly the staged code. pocp fix runs the checks and writes the packet, and the commit gets a trailer that points to it:
Proof-Of-Change: p-2f007850 subject=sha256:2ad8c12023b7 policy=sha256:f21acbea749e proven=1/1 attested=0/0
In CI, pocp verify origin/main..HEAD --require-coverage --rerun (the base branch, then the pull request's head):
re-runs every required check itself, instead of trusting the packets, which are only pointers;
judges the pull request by the base branch's rules, so the pull request can't remove or loosen a rule or add its own signing key;
when the pull request edits existing tests or test setup, runs the test check once, on the pull request's net change, so a weakening split across commits or placed in a merge commit is judged the same way. It has two modes (below);
fails with a named reason, and says when only a maintainer can resolve it, for example by approving an intended test change with a label. On GitHub, a separate trusted workflow turns that into one commit status, pocp: green when verified, yellow while it waits for a maintainer or a check didn't finish, red on a real failure (docs/STATUS.md).
收录徽章(可选)
想把收录标记放进 README 就复制这行,可选,不影响收录。
[![Listed on Anclum](https://anclum.com/badge/listed.svg)](https://anclum.com/zh/s/harriswekselblatt-pocp/)
来源
github · https://github.com/harriswekselblatt/pocp
按领域浏览
开源项目
Traction
1 ★
收录来源
2 个独立来源
收录于
今天

同类推荐

全部 1,671 →

所属领域与标签

每个标签都能点进去看同类的全部条目。数字是当前库里的真实条数。

浏览全部领域 →

← 返回索引