技能潮 SkillTide 提交收录
官方说明3 个来源MCP 服务3 天前
Continuum-AI-Corp/OrcaReplay

Continuum-AI-Corp/OrcaReplay

Record, replay and fork coding-agent runs
在 GitHub 查看 ↗直链 · 无中转页
来源明细
收录自 abordage/awesome-mcp 榜单(我们从中收集的条目之一) · 条目类型:MCP 服务
收录与活跃
收录于 2026-10-14 · 最近见到 2026-10-16 · 共见到 4 次 · 被 3 个来源列出
评分构成
综合分 303 · 3 个来源 · mcp
常见问题(答案都来自我们的记录)
怎么安装?
我们【没有】从该仓库取到安装命令(我们的 install 覆盖率只有约 4%)。请看它的 README 或 releases 页。
它适合谁 / 用来做什么?
我们把它归在这些标签下: MCP 服务。标签来自条目自身,不是我们强加的分类。
谁维护它、还在更新吗?
我们收录于 2026-10-14;最近见到 2026-10-16。这里没有"官方认证"或"质量评级"——我们只记录来源与时间。
第三方质量标记

OrcaReplay

以下摘录自该仓库的 README(片段) · 在 GitHub 读完整 README →

**English** · 简体中文 · 日本語 · 한국어 · Deutsch · Français · Español · العربية
Your agent broke something at 2am. Replay it at 9am — exactly, offline, as many times as you like.
Record any coding agent. Reproduce the run byte-for-byte with no model called. Fork it from any step
onto a different model and see who gets it right.
**Built by the team behind OrcaRouter** — one API key and one endpoint
for Claude, GPT, Gemini, Grok, DeepSeek, Qwen and the rest. It is what orca setup points at by
default, and what makes orca compare a single command instead of four provider accounts.
Find us: OrcaRouter All model APIs
Github Repos: OrcaCode Review · OrcaRouter Lite
Connect: X · Discord · Hugging Face · Ollama
Real output from one session — a Claude Code run recorded, replayed against the recording, then
forked at checkpoint 4 onto two models and graded by npx tsc --noEmit. Nothing here is mocked up.
Try it in three commands
One npm package named orcareplay, which puts one command named orca on your PATH. There is no
separate tool called "orca", and nothing is installed into your agent.
The third line is the one people stay for: same files, same conversation prefix, different model
from step 4 onward. The model is the only variable, which is what makes the answer mean anything.
The three commands at the top need an agent installed, a key, a network and real tokens. If you
have none of those yet, one command brings its own:
It writes a small project with a genuine bug in it and a recording of an agent fixing that bug,
then replays the recording against the project with no model called: two failing tests before,
four passing after, three turns served from the trace and nothing spent. --full prints the whole
timeline and the replay as it happened.
Read your agent's own system prompt
A proxy that sees the whole loop also sees the prompt the harness assembled before it sent
anything. One command captures it, scrubs the machine out of it, and files it by model:
Interactive prompts and -p prompts are not the same prompt, and neither is the same across
models. See capture/README.md for the measured differences, the pitfalls,
and the sanitising rules.
Why this exists
Agent debugging today is archaeology. You scroll a terminal, you re-run and get a different
failure, you add print statements to someone else's harness. The tools that exist are
observability tools: they tell you a run cost $4.12 and used 61k tokens, which is not the question
you have. The question you have is *why did it delete my migration file.*
OrcaReplay answers that by giving you the run back.
| | Observability tools | OrcaReplay |
|---|---|---|
| Tells you what a run cost | ✅ | ✅ |
| Tells you which tool call deleted the file | sometimes | ✅ |
| Runs the agent again and gets the same answer | ❌ | ✅ from the recording, byte-for-byte |
| Lets you change the model and re-run from step 4 | ❌ | ✅ |
| Needs you to modify your agent | usually an SDK wrapper | ❌ two env vars |
| Works after you close the terminal | ❌ | ✅ it is a file |
| Sees past the model API — shell exit codes, file writes | ❌ | ✅ every turn |
| Records an agent with no API endpoint to redirect | ❌ | ✅ opt-in --tls-intercept |
The last two rows are the ones an SDK wrapper structurally cannot reach. Capture happens *below*
the agent — at the process and socket boundary — so it does not matter whether the agent is
yours, whether you can edit it, or whether it even holds an API key: a Codex CLI signed in with
a ChatGPT subscription talks to its own backend over TLS, with a credential that only that backend
accepts, so it cannot be pointed elsewhere and stay the same session — and orca can still record
it. See
when the harness will not be redirected.
How it works
Model APIs are stateless, so on every turn an agent resends the entire conversation — including the
previous turn's tool results. **A proxy in front of the model therefore sees the whole loop**: each
request, each streamed response, every tool call the model emitted, and every tool result the
harness produced. That one property is what the tool is built on, and it is why **OrcaReplay does
not patch your agent** — it stands up a local proxy, sets two environment variables, and gets out of
the way.
**What "egress blocked" means, exactly.** On replay the proxy refuses to forward anything it cannot serve from the trace, so no model is called and no tokens are spent — that run prints egress=blocked. --loose lifts it deliberately: an unmatched request is then answered by the provider and recorded as a major divergence, and the same line reads egress=live-on-unmatched. A replay still *executes the recorded tool calls for real*, and a tool that opens its own socket — a shell command running curl, an MCP server fetching something — is outside the guarantee either way. By default it never reaches the proxy and goes to the network as usual. Under --tls-intercept it does reach the proxy, because that sets HTTPS_PROXY for the whole child: a host off the intercept list is tunnelled through untouched, though its hostname, port and byte counts still land in the trace, and a host on the list is refused there like any other unmatched call. Replay is not a sandbox; if you need one, run it inside one.
来源
awesome · https://github.com/Continuum-AI-Corp/OrcaReplay
按领域浏览
MCP 服务
收录于
昨天

更多MCP 服务

查看MCP 服务全部 5,525 条 →

所属领域与标签

每个标签都能点进去看同类的全部条目。数字是当前库里的真实条数。

浏览全部领域 →

← 返回索引