A
auracura/idea-autopsy
A Claude skill that tells you if an AI-generated business idea is BUSINESS, BULLETIN or BULLSHIT — with…
在 GitHub 查看 ↗链接已于 2026-11-12 核查 · HTTP 200 · 打开的是厂商自己的官网
安装与配置
客户端配置(取自该仓库的安装命令)
{
"mcpServers": {
"auracura-idea-autopsy": {
"command": "npx",
"args": ["skills"]
}
}
}解析自我们于 2026-10-29 抓取的该仓库 README;我们未执行过。
command/args 来自仓库写明的安装命令;不确定时请以该项目 README 为准。
VS Code(.vscode/mcp.json —— 键名是 servers)
{
"servers": {
"auracura-idea-autopsy": {
"command": "npx",
"args": ["skills"]
}
}
}VS Code 顶层键是 <code>servers</code>,其余与上面那份相同。
Claude Code(命令行)
claude mcp add --transport stdio auracura-idea-autopsy -- npx skills
Claude Code 不收 JSON 文件,用这条命令直接加。
配置项的键名以你的客户端为准:客户端与 CLI
- ★ 数取值
- 5 ★ · auracura/idea-autopsy · 取自 GitHub 搜索 API · (2026-11-13 20:00:50 核对)
- 来源明细
- 从该仓库的 GitHub 页面直接读取 · 条目类型:开源项目
- 收录与活跃
- 收录于 2026-10-30 · 最近见到 2026-11-14 · 共见到 16 次 · 被 1 个来源列出
- 评分构成
- 综合分 103 · 5 ★ · 1 个来源 · repo
- 安装
npx skills
常见问题(答案都来自我们的记录)
怎么安装?
该仓库给出的安装命令是
npx skills。我们的记录里它是仓库自己提供的;不保证在你的客户端上直接可用。它适合谁 / 用来做什么?
我们把它归在这些标签下: 开源项目。标签来自条目自身,不是我们强加的分类。
谁维护它、还在更新吗?
仓库
auracura/idea-autopsy;我们收录于 2026-10-30;最近见到 2026-11-14。这里没有"官方认证"或"质量评级"——我们只记录来源与时间。# Idea Autopsy
以下摘录自该仓库的 README(片段) · 在 GitHub 读完整 README →
A Claude skill that tells you whether a business idea — especially one an AI suggested — is a BUSINESS, a BUSINESS, WRONG OWNER, a BULLETIN (really just content), or BULLSHIT. It is deliberately hostile. Its job is to kill the idea; if the idea survives, it hands you the smallest test that would prove it wrong, with a kill line.
## Install
With skills.sh:
bash
npx skills add auracura/idea-autopsy
Or manually: copy SKILL.md to .claude/skills/idea-autopsy/SKILL.md.
Then say "autopsy this:" followed by the idea and your constraints, e.g. "autopsy this: a booking app for mobile barbers. 6 hours/week, $2k/month in a year, solo barbers, Trinidad."
## Where it came from
I spent four hours letting an AI pitch me side businesses: invoice-chasing tools, Caribbean land registries, verified-handmade badges, graduate-to-trades content sites, an "Etsy without AI slop". Eleven of twelve died — to a free government website, to a chatbot that already answers the question, to a funded team already running the race, and to my own calendar.
The machine generated. I decided. The deciding was a repeatable set of tests, so I wrote them down. This is them.
## The tests, in order
1. The Wrapper Test — what does a general-purpose LLM not have that this idea needs? Private data, action, trust/licence, presence, a captive audience, or live specificity. None of the six = wrapper.
2. The Crowd and the Graveyard — name five incumbents with prices; name who tried this and died. In 2026 any pain that makes the news has ten apps within a quarter.
3. The Time Test — casework doesn't fit evenings. Count the hidden weekly chores.
4. The World-Condition Test — what does the idea ride, and what happens when it reverses?
5. The Money Maths — with the owner's own target, not a nicer one.
6. Fresh Eyes — isolated reviewers, one lens each, for anything still alive.
7. Verdict + smallest test + kill line.
## What it did in testing (examples/)
01-ai-meal-planner.md — textbook LLM slop. BULLSHIT. Found the graveyard on its own: Yummly (Whirlpool) shut 2024, Mealime (Albertsons) shutting Oct 2026.
02-tax-prep-service.md — a real service I'm building, disguised. First verdict: BULLSHIT on the stated hours. It found that the "paperless" filing route requires a signed form physically dropped at a government office during business hours, and that the government is closing the wedge. I didn't know that.
03-one-page-site-builder.md — Carrd, described as if proposed today. BULLSHIT, because Carrd exists. Fair — and a limit: the skill judges an idea today; it cannot tell you what would have worked in 2016.
04-handmade-marketplace.md — Goimagine, disguised. BULLSHIT. It identified the real company, its US$400k raise, its US$40k/month burn, and its closure on 23 March 2026.
05-tax-prep-constraints-fixed.md — the same tax service with a paid runner and more hours. Verdict moved to BUSINESS, WRONG OWNER: wrapper test passed, hours now fit, but the owned audience is 7× too small for the target. That is the behaviour you want — the verdict moves with the constraints, and it names which one still fails.
## Install
With skills.sh:
bash
npx skills add auracura/idea-autopsy
Or manually: copy SKILL.md to .claude/skills/idea-autopsy/SKILL.md.
Then say "autopsy this:" followed by the idea and your constraints, e.g. "autopsy this: a booking app for mobile barbers. 6 hours/week, $2k/month in a year, solo barbers, Trinidad."
## Where it came from
I spent four hours letting an AI pitch me side businesses: invoice-chasing tools, Caribbean land registries, verified-handmade badges, graduate-to-trades content sites, an "Etsy without AI slop". Eleven of twelve died — to a free government website, to a chatbot that already answers the question, to a funded team already running the race, and to my own calendar.
The machine generated. I decided. The deciding was a repeatable set of tests, so I wrote them down. This is them.
## The tests, in order
1. The Wrapper Test — what does a general-purpose LLM not have that this idea needs? Private data, action, trust/licence, presence, a captive audience, or live specificity. None of the six = wrapper.
2. The Crowd and the Graveyard — name five incumbents with prices; name who tried this and died. In 2026 any pain that makes the news has ten apps within a quarter.
3. The Time Test — casework doesn't fit evenings. Count the hidden weekly chores.
4. The World-Condition Test — what does the idea ride, and what happens when it reverses?
5. The Money Maths — with the owner's own target, not a nicer one.
6. Fresh Eyes — isolated reviewers, one lens each, for anything still alive.
7. Verdict + smallest test + kill line.
## What it did in testing (examples/)
01-ai-meal-planner.md — textbook LLM slop. BULLSHIT. Found the graveyard on its own: Yummly (Whirlpool) shut 2024, Mealime (Albertsons) shutting Oct 2026.
02-tax-prep-service.md — a real service I'm building, disguised. First verdict: BULLSHIT on the stated hours. It found that the "paperless" filing route requires a signed form physically dropped at a government office during business hours, and that the government is closing the wedge. I didn't know that.
03-one-page-site-builder.md — Carrd, described as if proposed today. BULLSHIT, because Carrd exists. Fair — and a limit: the skill judges an idea today; it cannot tell you what would have worked in 2016.
04-handmade-marketplace.md — Goimagine, disguised. BULLSHIT. It identified the real company, its US$400k raise, its US$40k/month burn, and its closure on 23 March 2026.
05-tax-prep-constraints-fixed.md — the same tax service with a paid runner and more hours. Verdict moved to BUSINESS, WRONG OWNER: wrapper test passed, hours now fit, but the owned audience is 7× too small for the target. That is the behaviour you want — the verdict moves with the constraints, and it names which one still fails.
收录徽章(可选)
想把收录标记放进 README 就复制这行,可选,不影响收录。
[](https://anclum.com/zh/s/auracura-idea-autopsy/)
- 来源
- github · https://github.com/auracura/idea-autopsy
- 按领域浏览
- 开源项目
- Traction
- 5 ★
- 收录于
- 今天
同类推荐
所属领域与标签
每个标签都能点进去看同类的全部条目。数字是当前库里的真实条数。