A pasteable skeleton generated from the repository name. Check the project README for the exact package and arguments.
Star count
47 ★ · sarveshsea/memi · read from the repository page · (checked 2026-10-16 20:00:20)
Source
collected from the punkpeye/awesome-mcp-servers list · type: MCP server
Harvest history
first seen 2026-10-09 · last seen 2026-10-16 · seen 32× · listed by 7 sources
Score
score 703 · 47 ★ · 7 sources · mcp
FAQ (answers come from our records)
How do I install it?
We did not find an install command for this repository (our install coverage is only about 4%). Check its README or releases page.
Who is it for?
We filed it under these tags: MCP 服务. The tags come from the entry itself, not a taxonomy we imposed.
Who maintains it?
repository sarveshsea/memi;first catalogued 2026-10-09;last seen 2026-10-16。There is no official certification or quality rating here — we record sources and dates only.
**The design layer for agentic AI.** Give your coding agent an interface brief before it edits. Memi maps the UI already in your repository, surfaces file-anchored accessibility and design-system risks, and gives you a deterministic check to rerun before merge. Start with the CLI, then add the same gate to every pull request. Memi Studio is available today; Memi Canvas is currently in development. No account, API key, Figma file, global install, or daemon is required for the first audit. Start with your next interface · Get Memi Studio · Read the research Quickstart: find your first interface issue Run one non-destructive audit in any frontend repository. It needs no account, API key, Figma file, global install, or daemon. The result carries normalized finding IDs, confidence, provenance, and file:line evidence so an agent can act on a specific finding instead of guessing. Give the same context to your coding agent: Then ask: > Audit this frontend before editing it. Prioritize the five changes that will matter most to users, reuse the existing system, and verify the result after the patch. If Memi catches a real interface issue in your project, share the finding. Real reports are the most useful signal for what to improve next. Cost and offline operation Local source diagnosis uses deterministic rules: **no model call, API key, or model fee**. It checks the repository you provide and returns findings your agent can verify. Installation, CPU time, CI runners, and any agent you choose still have costs. The published research has not established an end-to-end dollar or token savings advantage. Start with one diagnosis, address the highest-confidence finding, and rerun the same check. Use --agent-context for a bounded file index instead of sending a whole repository to a model. Its routing is heuristic; a smaller context is not proof of a cheaper successful task. --files scopes reported findings without launching Git; it still scans the tree for aggregate statistics. **Published beta:** Install the exact 2.8.0-beta.2 package for the 2.8 frontend workflow. Stable remains 2.7.9; the beta is not a stable release. See current release state and known limitations. The beta2 npm release record identifies its published source and immutable artifact evidence. The beta1 npm release record preserves the earlier release's history; it does not validate beta2. The 2.8 locked default and explicit capability contract do not apply retroactively to 2.7.9. The beta keeps managed security review, SwiftUI parity, and full DesignWorkbench certification explicitly pending. It is not stable or employer-approved. Publication provenance and platform receipts belong to the exact released artifact. The beta prevents local diagnosis from writing project files by default, keeps paid integrations optional, and requires explicit grants for networking, subprocesses, and source report persistence. An npm install needs registry access; offline first-run claims require the separately verified bundle. See the acceptance ledger, known limitations, and release truth. **The 2.8 frontend workflow:** the beta provides a repository-aware frontend brief, four useful locked MCP tools, validated Figma/Paper evidence inputs, and explicit component-reuse conflicts. See the frontend workflow for runnable beta commands and the release plan for remaining gates. Managed independent security scanning and the reviewed-candidate-audit and swiftui-rendered-rerun receipts remain pending for stable. Paper pixel parity is unassessed. Of 158 inventoried CLI paths, 105 remain deferred; broad grants do not enable them. No complete-task dollar or token savings claim is established. What 2.8 changes for frontend agents | In 2.7.9 | In the 2.8 beta | | --- | --- | | Diagnosis, agent briefs, token tools, Figma bridge, and skills already existed. | agent brief --frontend joins actual exports, props, CSS/DTCG tokens, and CSF stories in a 2–16 KiB JSON response. |