claude mcp add agentic-wallet-guardian-v3 -- npx -y agentic-wallet-guardian-v3
A pasteable skeleton generated from the repository name. Check the project README for the exact package and arguments.
Star count
1 ★ · rudimentall1/agentic-wallet-guardian-v3 · read from the GitHub search API · (checked 2026-10-16 20:00:20)
Source
collected from the punkpeye/awesome-mcp-servers list · type: MCP server
Harvest history
first seen 2026-10-09 · last seen 2026-10-16 · seen 32× · listed by 7 sources
Score
score 703 · 1 ★ · 7 sources · mcp
FAQ (answers come from our records)
How do I install it?
We did not find an install command for this repository (our install coverage is only about 4%). Check its README or releases page.
Who is it for?
We filed it under these tags: MCP 服务. The tags come from the entry itself, not a taxonomy we imposed.
Who maintains it?
repository rudimentall1/agentic-wallet-guardian-v3;first catalogued 2026-10-09;last seen 2026-10-16。There is no official certification or quality rating here — we record sources and dates only.
Watch the demo Select the preview to play the video in your browser. 📄 Read the white paper **Let AI agents transact on-chain without giving them unrestricted control of the wallet.** Guardian evaluates each proposed action before signing or broadcast and returns an explainable ALLOW / WARN / BLOCK decision. It runs on your own infrastructure, using your own policy rules and your own reputation data - see Why self-hosted for why that matters and how this differs from calling a hosted security API directly. Guardian is chain- and use-case-agnostic - Arc/USDC below is one live deployment, not the whole scope. See docs/hackathons.md for which track this submission targets and why. Arc Mainnet Demo **Live demo:** http://77.239.125.37:8765/arc **Demo video:** https://youtu.be/srH0ZLwtwqQ Agentic Wallet Guardian is deployed on Arc mainnet and includes a live browser demo for USDC payments. The Guardian evaluates the requested operation before execution, applies its security policies, and only an approved operation is passed to the user's wallet for signing. **Verified Arc mainnet transaction:** 0xd781e8b04b5ca89c3a34fcec50a6636049f7647d2b0e1b2bb64d5b1ee54daadf The transaction was successfully executed on Arc mainnet using USDC through the Guardian demo. --- **See it decide, live:** run the API locally (GUARDIAN_ENABLE_CORS_FOR_BROWSER_DEMO=true uvicorn api.main:app --reload), then open examples/browser-demo.html in a browser - no build step, no server for the page itself. Every scenario button sends a real POST /decision to your running instance and renders the actual response (risk score, every signal that fed into it, every policy rule that fired) - nothing in the page is scripted or faked. GUARDIAN_ENABLE_CORS_FOR_BROWSER_DEMO is off by default (see guardian/config.py) since it's specifically for this local-demo case, not something to leave on for a real deployment. --- Why self-hosted There are good hosted alternatives for agent-transaction security (GoPlus's AgentGuard, Blockaid, Chainalysis/TRM for compliance). If you just want a risk score and don't care who sees the query, calling one of those directly is less work than running this. Guardian exists for the cases where that tradeoff doesn't work for you: - **Nothing about which wallets, contracts, or amounts your agents touch leaves your infrastructure.** Threat-intel and contract allow/deny checks are local JSON files you populate yourself (see data/threat_lists/README.md), not a lookup call to a third party. A hosted API inherently sees every address and amount you ask it about. - **Your policy rules live in your code, not a vendor's dashboard.** Spending caps, reputation gates, and which action types require confirmation are plain Python in guardian/policy/, reviewable and changeable without waiting on anyone else's product roadmap. - **No per-call fees or rate limits imposed by someone else** - only the ones you configure for your own users (GUARDIAN_RATE_LIMIT_PER_MINUTE). - **No vendor lock-in.** Every external data source (RPC endpoint, Blockscout instance, DexScreener) is swappable behind a small provider interface - see Architecture. The honest tradeoff going the other way: you also take on running it, keeping your local threat lists current, and you don't get a hosted vendor's chain coverage or dedicated threat-research team for free. This is the right choice for teams that specifically need data sovereignty or deep policy customization - not a strict upgrade over every hosted option. --- Architecture Every data source in steps 2-4 is a small provider interface with a mock implementation (zero config, zero network calls) and a real one, selected per-source by environment variable - see .env.example. Switching from demo mode to a real deployment is a config change, not a code change. Repository layout guardian/* is intentionally dependency-free (standard library only, except where a real provider needs httpx or web3), so the decision core can be unit-tested, embedded in another service, or ported to a different web framework without dragging FastAPI along. Only api/ touches pydantic/FastAPI. --- Honesty about the current state This is real, runnable, tested decision infrastructure with real (not mock) data sources available for every signal source - but "available" isn't the same as "flip a switch and trust it blindly." Specifics: - **Wallet (RPC provider):** is_contract and tx_count (nonce-based) are reliable with any JSON-RPC endpoint. Wallet *age* requires an