R
rmarji/nitpick
Your harshest reviewer, before your audience is
View on GitHub ↗Link checked 2026-11-12 · HTTP 200 · opens the vendor's own site
Official descriptionYour harshest reviewer, before your audience is. /nitpick any video, post, deck, page or code: ranked problems, a fix for each, and the ones worth making.
Install & config
Client config (built from the install command this repo gives)
{
"mcpServers": {
"rmarji-nitpick": {
"command": "npx",
"args": ["skills"]
}
}
}Parsed from the README we fetched on 2026-11-07; we have not executed it.
command/args come from the install command the repository states. When it is ambiguous, the project README wins.
VS Code (.vscode/mcp.json - the key is servers)
{
"servers": {
"rmarji-nitpick": {
"command": "npx",
"args": ["skills"]
}
}
}Same server, but VS Code keeps it under <code>servers</code>.
Claude Code (command line)
claude mcp add --transport stdio rmarji-nitpick -- npx skills
Claude Code does not read a config file; add the server with this command.
Key names differ by client: Clients & CLI
- Star count
- 1 ★ · rmarji/nitpick · read from the GitHub search API · (checked 2026-11-13 20:00:50)
- Source
- read directly from its GitHub page · type: open-source project
- Harvest history
- first seen 2026-11-08 · last seen 2026-11-14 · seen 7× · listed by 1 sources
- Score
- score 103 · 1 ★ · 1 sources · repo
- Install
npx skills
FAQ (answers come from our records)
How do I install it?
The repository provides this install command:
npx skills. It comes from the repository itself; we cannot guarantee it runs as-is in your client.Who is it for?
We filed it under these tags: Agent 技能. The tags come from the entry itself, not a taxonomy we imposed.
Who maintains it?
repository
rmarji/nitpick；first catalogued 2026-11-08；last seen 2026-11-14。There is no official certification or quality rating here — we record sources and dates only./nitpick
以下摘录自该仓库的 README（片段） · 在 GitHub 读完整 README →
Your harshest reviewer, before your audience is.
One command that tears apart anything you are about to ship, ranks every problem by how much it hurts, and tells you which fixes are worth the time.
AI is great at telling you your work looks good. That is the problem.
/nitpick does the opposite. It opens the real thing the way your audience will meet it (stills from every scene of your video, your landing page at phone width, your post as a stranger skims it), hunts for what breaks, and hands you a ranked list with a fix for every item. Then it picks the 3 to 5 fixes worth making and tells you what they cost.
It never edits your work. It just makes sure you know before everyone else does.
## Install
bash
npx skills add rmarji/nitpick
Or in Claude Code as a plugin:
/plugin marketplace add rmarji/nitpick
/plugin install nitpick@nitpick
Or copy skills/nitpick/SKILL.md into your agent's skills folder (for Claude Code: ~/.claude/skills/nitpick/SKILL.md).
## Use it
/nitpick
/nitpick launch-video.mp4 --for "X launch, strangers scrolling on a phone"
/nitpick the landing page --depth quick
/nitpick this PR
No target means it nitpicks the last thing you made together. Plain language works too: "nitpick this", "tear this apart", "roast this", "what's wrong with this?"
## What you get
A real run on a 60 second launch video, trimmed:
> Biggest problem: it claims benefits it never shows. "Act the moment you arrive" is said, but nothing is ever clicked, finished or celebrated. Confidence 4/5. What would change my mind: if your audience mostly wants the idea, not the product.
> Hurts the message
> 1. No action on screen. Nobody presses Done, no confetti, no level-up. The payoff moment is the benefit and it is missing.
> 2. "Example:" on every label reads as a mockup. Use realistic fictional names in the video, put the honesty note in the post.
> 3. The first benefit lands at 0:08. The aerial has a cloud covering a third of the frame and labels unreadable on a phone.
> Weakens trust
> 4. "70 AI agents" in the hook, about 10 on screen. Viewers notice. Say "my agents" or fill the scene.
> 5. Same location shown twice, so it looks like there is only one project.
> Polish
> 6. Clunky caption at 0:50. Try "Remember by place, not by list."
> My pick: fix 1, 2, 3, 5 and 6 now (4 comes almost free). About 2 hours of re-render.
> Next action: reply "fix my pick" or "skip".
A hypothetical review of a draft social post:
> Biggest problem: the opening never names the product. Confidence 4/5. What would change my mind: if this is a reply where the product is already named.
> Hurts the message
> 1. "Meet the future" says nothing specific. Name the product and what it does in the opening line.
> My pick: fix 1 now. One opening-line rewrite, no new assets.
> Next action: reply "fix my pick" or "skip".
## How it judges
Every nitpick runs nine lenses and skips the ones that do not apply:
| Lens | It asks |
| Promise vs proof | Is every claim shown, or only stated? Do the numbers match? |
One command that tears apart anything you are about to ship, ranks every problem by how much it hurts, and tells you which fixes are worth the time.
AI is great at telling you your work looks good. That is the problem.
/nitpick does the opposite. It opens the real thing the way your audience will meet it (stills from every scene of your video, your landing page at phone width, your post as a stranger skims it), hunts for what breaks, and hands you a ranked list with a fix for every item. Then it picks the 3 to 5 fixes worth making and tells you what they cost.
It never edits your work. It just makes sure you know before everyone else does.
## Install
bash
npx skills add rmarji/nitpick
Or in Claude Code as a plugin:
/plugin marketplace add rmarji/nitpick
/plugin install nitpick@nitpick
Or copy skills/nitpick/SKILL.md into your agent's skills folder (for Claude Code: ~/.claude/skills/nitpick/SKILL.md).
## Use it
/nitpick
/nitpick launch-video.mp4 --for "X launch, strangers scrolling on a phone"
/nitpick the landing page --depth quick
/nitpick this PR
No target means it nitpicks the last thing you made together. Plain language works too: "nitpick this", "tear this apart", "roast this", "what's wrong with this?"
## What you get
A real run on a 60 second launch video, trimmed:
> Biggest problem: it claims benefits it never shows. "Act the moment you arrive" is said, but nothing is ever clicked, finished or celebrated. Confidence 4/5. What would change my mind: if your audience mostly wants the idea, not the product.
> Hurts the message
> 1. No action on screen. Nobody presses Done, no confetti, no level-up. The payoff moment is the benefit and it is missing.
> 2. "Example:" on every label reads as a mockup. Use realistic fictional names in the video, put the honesty note in the post.
> 3. The first benefit lands at 0:08. The aerial has a cloud covering a third of the frame and labels unreadable on a phone.
> Weakens trust
> 4. "70 AI agents" in the hook, about 10 on screen. Viewers notice. Say "my agents" or fill the scene.
> 5. Same location shown twice, so it looks like there is only one project.
> Polish
> 6. Clunky caption at 0:50. Try "Remember by place, not by list."
> My pick: fix 1, 2, 3, 5 and 6 now (4 comes almost free). About 2 hours of re-render.
> Next action: reply "fix my pick" or "skip".
A hypothetical review of a draft social post:
> Biggest problem: the opening never names the product. Confidence 4/5. What would change my mind: if this is a reply where the product is already named.
> Hurts the message
> 1. "Meet the future" says nothing specific. Name the product and what it does in the opening line.
> My pick: fix 1 now. One opening-line rewrite, no new assets.
> Next action: reply "fix my pick" or "skip".
## How it judges
Every nitpick runs nine lenses and skips the ones that do not apply:
| Lens | It asks |
| Promise vs proof | Is every claim shown, or only stated? Do the numbers match? |
Listed badge (optional)
Copy this line into the README if you want the listing mark. Optional, and it does not affect being listed.
[](https://anclum.com/en/s/rmarji-nitpick/)
- Source
- github · https://github.com/rmarji/nitpick
- Browse by field
- Agent skills
- Traction
- 1 ★
- added
- today
More like this
Filed under
Every tag opens the full list for that filter. Counts are the live catalogue figures.