Independent by design · no pay-to-rank placements  · How we evaluate tools →
Anclum Submit
C

camdnn/security-skills

Claude MD files to go through codebase and dynamically detect security vulnerabilities based on the codebase…

Before you install: no copy-paste command · no license recorded · link reachable

First step: nothing runnable here yet - start from the repository: https://github.com/camdnn/security-skills

View on GitHub ↗Link checked 2026-11-12 · HTTP 200 · opens the vendor's own site
Star count
0 ★ · camdnn/security-skills · read from the GitHub search API · (checked 2026-11-13 20:00:50)
Source
read directly from its GitHub page · type: open-source project
Harvest history
first seen 2026-10-29 · last seen 2026-11-14 · seen 17× · listed by 2 sources
Score
score 203 · 2 sources · repo
FAQ (answers come from our records)
Who is it for?
We filed it under these tags: 开源项目. The tags come from the entry itself, not a taxonomy we imposed.
Who maintains it?
repository camdnn/security-skills;first catalogued 2026-10-29;last seen 2026-11-14。There is no official certification or quality rating here — we record sources and dates only.

# System Security Vulnerability Analyzer

以下摘录自该仓库的 README(片段) · 在 GitHub 读完整 README →

A Claude plugin of security Agent Skills that finds vulnerabilities in a codebase, shows where they are and how they trace back to entry points and business rules, ranks them by risk, and can fix them using test-driven development.
Team: Curren Sebastian · Camden Mann Track: System or Tool Design
## Goal
AI coding tools write more and more production code, and that code is often insecure. Developers rarely prompt for security. This plugin adds a security layer to AI-assisted development that:
1. Understands what the program is supposed to do (business rules, intent, architecture)
2. Finds vulnerabilities and explains where they are, why they exist, and how they trace back to the source
3. Prioritizes them with a DREAD risk score (1–5)
4. Fixes them on request, with a test that proves each vulnerability was real and is now gone
Accuracy is measured, not assumed: an automated checker scores every change against known-vulnerable apps (OWASP Juice Shop, NodeGoat).
## Intended Users
| User | Use |
| Developers using AI coding tools | Check AI-generated code before it ships |
| Small teams without a security engineer | A first-pass security review with explanations |
| Students and learners | Learn why code is vulnerable and how secure fixes look |
| Reviewers | A ranked, traceable list of findings to focus a code review |
Initial scope: Node.js / TypeScript + Express web applications.
## How It Works
1. /analyzer:security-context manual · read-only
Explores the code, interviews the developer (each question has a recommended
answer), and writes context docs + a plan to docs/security/.
2. /analyzer:security-scan manual · read-only
Uses the context if present (or offers to build it), runs the relevant checks,
and reports every finding with location, trace, DREAD score, and suggested fix.
/analyzer:secure-coding-guide optional · manual
Turns scan results into secure-coding rules for this project.
3. /analyzer:implement manual · opt-in · the only step that changes code
Fixes chosen findings with TDD on a separate branch.
## Skills
### Workflow
| Skill | What it does |
| security-context | Builds a security model of the program: roles, permissions, business rules, developer intent, architecture, and module contracts. Saves the developer's answers and a recommended plan. Never modifies code. |
| security-scan | Orchestrator. Loads the context (warns if stale), starts from entry points, runs checks per module, merges and deduplicates findings, ranks by DREAD, and writes SCAN-REPORT.md + findings.json. Works without context, at lower confidence for business-logic flaws. |
| secure-coding-guide | Optional. Reads the scan results and writes secure defaults for the patterns this project got wrong, so the same bugs aren't reintroduced. |
| implement | Opt-in. For each chosen finding: writes a test that exploits it (must fail), applies the smallest fix (test passes), runs the full suite, and re-scans to confirm the finding is gone. Untestable findings are flagged for human review. |
### Checks (run by security-scan, or individually)
| Skill | Finds | DREAD (1–5) |
| secrets-check | Hardcoded API keys, passwords, tokens, private keys | 4.8 |
Listed badge (optional)
Copy this line into the README if you want the listing mark. Optional, and it does not affect being listed.
[![Listed on Anclum](https://anclum.com/badge/listed.svg)](https://anclum.com/en/s/camdnn-security-skills/)
Source
github · https://github.com/camdnn/security-skills
Browse by field
Open source
Listed by
2 independent sources
added
today

More like this

All 1,671 →

Filed under

Every tag opens the full list for that filter. Counts are the live catalogue figures.

Browse all fields →

← Back to index